- Joined
- Sep 1, 2010
- Messages
- 30,761
- Reaction score
- 37,994
What relevance does the Pittsburgh part have? He’s here now and ours to deal with.Great recap, borg. My last post on this subject was EIGHTY pages ago when I had thought that this topic had finally reached a point that comments had started to repeat themselves. If you had written this recap 80 pages ago, it would have been appropriate.
I have no idea WHY this thread has gone on for this long, nor do I care to go back more than 3 pages to find out. Seems like its the same stuff we talked about then.
Here's the important things to remember.
1. It all happened when he was playing for PITTSBURGH!
2. Its a CIVIL matter. One party trying to get money from another for actions the other supposedly did.
3. Both parties in this suit have flawed positions. Clearly this isn't clear.
4. Nothing I've read so far should (though I did miss 80 pages, ) should disqualify AB from playing.
5. He's clearly an idiot, and I wouldn't my daughter go out with him, but if idiots were banned from their jobs, then the unemployment rate would be over 30%
Not saying this in a snarky way, just saying I don’t think clinging to what team he was on really matters.