MainePatsFan26
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2011
- Messages
- 1,385
- Reaction score
- 1,532
You're right. I wish I could edit the poll!(It was actually a “guy”, but I voted Ray)
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.You're right. I wish I could edit the poll!(It was actually a “guy”, but I voted Ray)
I know calling this thread droll is probably a criticism, but I'm glad someone is getting amusement from all this. The whole Antonio Brown Circus (ABC) is surreal and buffoonish in all the amusing sort of ways. Or, in other words, it's as easy as ABC, 123 baby you and me. Or something equally outlandish if I got the lyrics wrong.This thread is very, very, very droll. And no, I don’t get paid by the word, it’s just very, very, very droll. Thank you, Dingleberry, and I say, Dingleberry, for the pure joy of the way the word sounds and not so much the meaning. “Dingleberry.” You try it, “Dingleberry.” See, it lights up your tongue.
This thread is very, very, very droll. And no, I don’t get paid by the word, it’s just very, very, very droll. Thank you, Dingleberry, and I say, Dingleberry, for the pure joy of the way the word sounds and not so much the meaning. “Dingleberry.” You try it, “Dingleberry.” See, it lights up your tongue.
Probably for the best. He'd probably throw down the iPad he is accessing it on, thus having alienated both Apple and Microsoft.Belichick doesn’t use FatsPans.com.
I notice many don't like the hate...I couldn't care less...just makes winning sweeter. People have thin skin, just enjoy the product on the field, the rest is meaningless.Did I just read somewhere that this woman is getting married this weekend??!! Wouldn't you wait till afterwards before unleashing this media **** storm? This keeps getting weirder and weirder?
I heard a caller on talk radio equate Bob Kraft to Bill Cosby today. Host did not argue. The hate runs deep for our beloved team. This is off the charts.
She lacked any evidence what so ever. It was sad and really hurt the women who were really sexually abused. She was a political operative, plain and simple, and tried to use the metoo stuff for political gain.Not really - she was credible but lack of definitive proof.
yup, and her lawyer recently admitted thatShe lacked any evidence what so ever. It was sad and really set hurt the women who were really sexually abused. She was a political operative, plain and simple, and tried to use the metoo stuff for political gain.
The SJW mob on Twitter freaks out of someone even udders the term “innocent until proven guilty”
SMY is a gutter rat, as is anybody who takes the guilty until proven innocent approach.
Brown’s legal team is counter-suing. If it can be proven she’s lying, she can go to prison. False allegations of rape conviction is a serious offenseCivil Lawsuit. Neither is going to prison right?
Good. Start throwing the book at these women who openly lie about these things and watch as they stop. Not only are you threatening someone with prison time through your allegation, you’re also costing them tons of money and doing a massive amount of damage to their reputation (well... maybe not in Brown’s case) that, even if it’s found the accuser lied, they will never get back. If there is hardcore evidence that they made it up, it isn’t right for them to just be able to walk away after that and fade off into obscurity, leaving the wreckage they caused behind.Brown’s legal team is counter-suing. If it can be proven she’s lying, she can go to prison. False allegations of rape conviction is a serious offense
That’s a big “if”. After all, Brown may be guilty.
Don’t be a narc@Ian , this thread is getting way out of hand.
The way I read this Twitter exchange, she has captured his post (the box inside her post) and then comments on it.You guys take a look at who's replying to whom.
In that screen shot, SMY apparently ejects the aggrieved party, who replies to her something about innocent until proven guilty. You've got the order of events reversed.
Now, whatever opinion you have of her might be justified by other events, tweets, etc., or your impression of previous interactions in the thread posted. But it's not illustrated by the exchange posted here. She does not eject him for saying that people are innocent until proven guilty; he replies that people are innocent until proven guilty after being ejected.