Antonio Brown

TB12GOATQB said:

This ALLEGATION will now only fuel the fire for those 2. How anyone takes them seriously after being so wrong so often about the local teams is funny.

Click to expand...

Wait...what???!!
There are people that take Squeaky & The Douche seriously? Not counting anyone directly affiliated with them please name them. It's only humane, we need to get them some help

UptownPatsFan said:

Click to expand...

Looks like Dorsett got his wish.

Patstastic said:

AB has thrown furniture off a balcony, got a speeding ticket, no show/benched for week 17 last season, taped private conversations/speeches of two different coaches, helmet drama, Raiders fiasco, and now this. There is history there. Unless I'm mistaken, I don't believe Goodell needs evidence to put him out.

Click to expand...

And...Our owner was videotaped getting a happy ending at a AMP.

Deus Irae said:

Human morality as a whole, obviously does not fit that definition, though. What a specific moral code is based upon may be a variable, but that's a different issue. And that's even without getting into the true/false question about the existence of a higher power. You're trying to claim that an orange isn't an orange because it came from a tree that's surrounded by coconuts.

Christian morality is based, significantly, upon the bible, particularly the new testament. Jewish morality is based, significantly, upon the torah. Etc...

What you're trying to argue is that specific moral leanings may be arbitrary, and that such a possibility somehow requires that all morality is arbitrary. That's nonsensical.

There's a good reason why murder is considered immoral, for example, and it has nothing to do with individual personal preference, random choice, or personal whim.

Click to expand...

This is a debate that has been waged throughout human history with many taking up your line of thinking and just as many taking up mine. It's a debate that probably won't come to any satisfying conclusion in our lifetime.

It's really the fundamental philosophical question relating to human morality. At one point, nobody considered murder to be immoral because the idea of morality didn't even exist at one point in human development.

But I'm willing to agree to disagree, as this is something we could discuss for eternity and not necessarily come to full agreement.

upstater1 said:

Mostly agree, but it depends on when they were taken. Is it before she allegedly complained about his behavior?

Click to expand...

Does it really mater when the videos were taken? What matter is that she was half naked sitting on the same bed as AB. Proves she's a lying tart.

IllegalContact said:

a felger inspired team would not win a game............ever

Click to expand...

He’s basically just a television character. He must be loving this AB stuff.

dreighver said:

It's seems others aren't engaging with the content of your posts and offering thoughtful counter-examples.

Rather, they're attacking the credibility of your argument without explaining why they see your argument as wrong/incorrect, while making no attempt to offer their own counterargument.

Click to expand...

I’ve made plenty of points that directly address his posts. There is no counter argument to thoughts like “millions upon millions of transgression upon the the oppressed” because it’s not only an invalid point, it’s wrong on many levels

Justice only deals with the present facts unless there’s a legal precedent that is relevant.

You offered nothing in your post other than support for the oppressive poster.

Patstastic said:

AB has thrown furniture off a balcony, got a speeding ticket, no show/benched for week 17 last season, taped private conversations/speeches of two different coaches, helmet drama, Raiders fiasco, and now this. There is history there. Unless I'm mistaken, I don't believe Goodell needs evidence to put him

Click to expand...

Got a speeding ticket.

You're right. String him up.

The balcony thing was investigated by the league and no action was taken.

Technically, no Goodell doesn't need a reason, but I'm 1000% sure he doesn't want this precedent.

Unless there is substantial evidence that we're not currently privy to, nothing's going to happen.

But by all means, keep trolling with your Felger takes. They're scorching hot.

EddardSnow67 said:

Is it immoral for an adult male lion to kill rival male cubs?

Click to expand...

It is but the lion lacks the intelligent thought necessary to understand that.

At one point, it wasn't considered immoral for a human to kill a human child.

Click to expand...

Of course it was.

It's only considered immoral now because we've developed a set of logical axioms concerning the idea of morality.

Click to expand...

I don’t think you are clear on the meaning of immoral.

TB12GOATQB said:

They're asking Brady now live about AB. He's just not answering any of the questions as expected.

Click to expand...

As expected, he’s not answering any of the questions? Or he’s not answering any of the questions as expected?

Inside look by Matt Cassel.

Cassel: Here's how Pats will handle AB saga

Fatmancryin said:

Click to expand...

The headline will be: Tom Brady SLAMs Antonio Brown over rape allegations

IllegalContact said:

a felger inspired team would not win a game............ever

Click to expand...

If I remember he's from Wisconsin? He's a Green Bay fan at heart? Must drive him nuts how the two legends of GB won so little compared to the team he now covers in NE.

The only writers more delusional and more wrong about BB and the Patriots over the last 2 decades are Ron "Plagiarist" Borges and Dan "Shank" Shaughnessy. Two dinosaurs who used to hold sway over NE sports dialogue but have been irrelevant for 20 years and counting and who have been woefully wrong over and over again. Borges seems to have disappeared after having 6 championships shoved down his gullet and Shaughnessy is more miserable and angry than ever. Heard him the other day and the disdain for the Patriots success is beyond palpable. I think also he is jealous as a Red Sox "journalist" first and his beloved heroes of the past have all been lapped several times over by BB and TB12 in Boston sports lore.

PatriotsReign said:

I’ve made plenty of points that directly address his posts. There is no counter argument to thoughts like “millions upon millions of transgression upon the the oppressed” because it’s not only an invalid point, it’s wrong on many levels

Justice only deals with the present facts unless there’s a legal precedent that is relevant.

You offered nothing in your post other than support for the oppressive poster.

Click to expand...

"Oppressive poster"?

That is a mischaracterization of Eddard's approach on here, IMO, given that he has stated multiple times that others are welcome to hold whatever opinions/reach whatever conclusions they please.

PP2 said:

Uh... or more likely we just got smarter, as a species.

Click to expand...

Yes. Any thought that sprung from that evolution did so arbitrarily. There was no morality, then there was. It didn't exist from the beginning of time, unless you believe in intelligent design, which I don't. Anyone who does will surely disagree with me and that's valid.

Take these for what their worth but apparently that’s the accuser. If you click the tweet it loads more videos of the two of them.

ivanvamp said:

I didn't say anything about morality.

Click to expand...

True, but without the morality component you're left with an especially meaningless statement. On par with learning that someone got in a car accident and stating that statistically, if he hadn't been on the road that wouldn't have happened.

Reporters are definitely kinder to TB than they are to BB. They asked a few questions about AB, he said he's not talking about his situation and that's that.

PatriotsReign said:

I’ve made plenty of points that directly address his posts. There is no counter argument to thoughts like “millions upon millions of transgression upon the the oppressed” because it’s not only an invalid point, it’s wrong on many levels

Justice only deals with the present facts unless there’s a legal precedent that is relevant.

You offered nothing in your post other than support for the oppressive poster.

Click to expand...

I simply stated one of the reasons for the state of the world in this context, I never once suggested I agree with it.

In fact, I went out of my way to assert that I *don't* agree with its validity. But the fact remains that it's the reasoning being used by many.