Ring 6
PatsFans.com Supporter
PatsFans.com Supporter
2021 Weekly Picks Winner
2022 Weekly Picks Winner
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 63,761
- Reaction score
- 14,113
I guess I am confused by your post thenI guess we disagree on the bolded part. Like always, there is still 2 weeks of Pre-Season so much can change, but Im talking about guys that are showing enough to prove to me that they can play today. Some examples:
Brooks, Krossen/Dawson, Munson (after last game, at least), Calhoun/Rivers (Ive seen plenty of people putting one or another), Cowart, One Extra OL, Gunner (or Berrios, although I don't think he has the potential...). Obviosuly Im not including the rookies that have already showed enough to stick
Basically comes down to one question: From here on, which players can give the most return, not only this year, but on following years as well? That's the mentality Im going for
Are you asking if the young guys are better than the old guys or if we should keep them for potential even if the older guy is better for the team this year?
Brooks isn’t a young developmental player. He is 27 and a 5 year vet. A year younger than Harmon.
Crossen makes or breaks on special teams and I don’t see him as ever a legit starting potential corner
Cowart is making the team.
I don’t see anyone else you listed as a high potential guy or a guy (Rivers/Calhoun) that have been around long enough that it’s about now because if they haven’t developed yet they never will.
Maybe I would better understand if you gave examples X vs Y because I’m not seeing examples of best long term return vs short term return that are legit questions.