Gumby
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2004
- Messages
- 4,559
- Reaction score
- 2,847
Those are certainly areas to evaluate a WR.
When talking about elite dominant WR play I would consider production more important than blocking and I would expect taking double coverage to be a given to start the conversation of dominant WR.
As far as Gordon I’d say his blocking was a positive but I did not see him commanding excessive double teams in fact it was an issue all year that teams continued to double gronk. Not going to get into arguing that because it’s a rabbit hole so if we disagree on that point, so be it.
Not looking [edit] for an argument either.
I don't feel qualified to (objectively/quantitatively) evaluate those areas (for Gordon or others either). I was primarily just throwing the criteria out there.
But I had the impression he was an above avg & enthusiastic blocker. I remember at least two plays when other WRs got 10+ more yds solely due to him.
When you watch other teams, most WRs don't even fake an effort. All Pats WRs seem to be coached up to at least try. And he seemed to me to be above avg for Pats WRs .
Last edited: