- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 37,541
- Reaction score
- 16,315
The top 3 WR's usually get 90% of the receptions. 2 of those 3 played with Brady last year, and Thomas will be fine as a #3 WR.
If your concern is about Brady having another familiar receiver, then we should indeed keep Dorsett. Myers is your #6, a development player for 2020.
QUOTE="BobDigital, post: 5625402, member: 32980"]The WR position is officially log jammed. I assume DT will want to start week 1 to try to hit his incentives.
Edelman, Gorden, Harry Meyers, Dorsett, Thomas. That is 6 and frankly 1 more than you need. While I hate to walk away from a player in the TB circle of trust Dorsett is cuttable. He is due 2.6M and only .5M is on the books. DT can be cut as well. I think he is only getting paid 150K for sure with the rest TBD.
While clearly Thomas has more upside there is a real question here. Do you want 3 players in the WR core that Brady has never played with? IDK if we do. IT worked out in 2007 but those were amazing players who were ready to rock the league week 1 and had been pros for a while.[/QUOTE]
If your concern is about Brady having another familiar receiver, then we should indeed keep Dorsett. Myers is your #6, a development player for 2020.
QUOTE="BobDigital, post: 5625402, member: 32980"]The WR position is officially log jammed. I assume DT will want to start week 1 to try to hit his incentives.
Edelman, Gorden, Harry Meyers, Dorsett, Thomas. That is 6 and frankly 1 more than you need. While I hate to walk away from a player in the TB circle of trust Dorsett is cuttable. He is due 2.6M and only .5M is on the books. DT can be cut as well. I think he is only getting paid 150K for sure with the rest TBD.
While clearly Thomas has more upside there is a real question here. Do you want 3 players in the WR core that Brady has never played with? IDK if we do. IT worked out in 2007 but those were amazing players who were ready to rock the league week 1 and had been pros for a while.[/QUOTE]