Family
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2012
- Messages
- 2,454
- Reaction score
- 4,124
Harris is older than Dorsett, and Dorsett has been the better player to this point in their respective careers. So, I'm not sure how we're defining "fair", here, and I'm not saying that there's no way that Harris can ever possibly be better than Dorsett but, so far, there is nothing that would indicate that Harris has a higher upside than Dorsett.
Harris was born in November 92 and Dorsett - January 93..... so this age difference is worth pointing out? Really???
Except for flashes neither has had more than a marginal career, but Dorsett has spent two years catching from Tom Brady averaging less than 250 yards receiving a season. Harris has been stuck in a mess at Washington and had more yards last year than any Dorsett season with Brady , but this doesn't mean anything either.
My statement was "it's fair for some posters to believe there is more upside to Harris." Why would it not be fair for a poster to believe Harris was better, if someone saw something in his game? Is Dorsett that good to you?
Where did I ever say I've seen anything to indicate Harris has more upside, other than it was fair for someone else to have seen something in his game. Maybe posters are looking at the fact that every chance the Pats have had so far to promote Dorsett, the team has drifted back to another option.
Has Dorsett been so much a superior player to this point in their respective careers that you refuse to accept this a fair belief for someone else to have?