Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
give me a break. if that's all it takes to shake up rask then they wouldn't be in the finals in the first place. Do you really think rask gives a sh!t who the flag captain is? Unbelievable lol. i thought you were done watching the games?
And that's how they played in games 2, 4 & 5, and for the first 2+ periods of game 6. Rask - and Rask alone - kept them competitive until they started knocking in some shots during the 3rd period.
And I'll be here later tonight & thereafter to eat my crow if they win, but they'll need to show Game 3 dominance in order to do so because they won't be given any PP opportunities to bail them out. It's Even Strength or Bust, and their highest-paid players have to lead the way; their 3rd & 4th lines have already done More than their share.
If Orr didnt get hurt and traded, Boston would have been a NHL dynasty.
...and if Ed Johnston hadn't surrendered 5 straight goals during game 2 in Boston of the 1971 quarter-finals vs Montreal, the Bs would've won 3 straight cups to start that dynasty.
I positioned things to be as favorable as possible to our teams, of course.
if the whl wasn't created the Bruins would be a dynasty.
i think hes a difference maker. tory krug part 2.
Besides 1970 & 1972, they should've won in 1971 & 1974 (Philthy was Not the better team) and in 1979. That's 5 in the decade compared to Montreal's (what should've been only) 4.
Ce soir, vous êtes cordialement invité au TD Garden pour profiter de la victoire des Bruins sur les Blues de St. Louis et de Boston en remportant la Coupe de Stanley. Merci et amusez-vous.
I positioned things to be as favorable as possible to our teams, of course.
