primetime
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2005
- Messages
- 13,627
- Reaction score
- 15,375
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.He’s had a bunch of plays get called back if I remember correctly.There was that awesome long run yesterday that would have "iced the game"....but Develin held.
In general, we are average to below average running the ball. If the other team even thinks we are running, we get held to under 3 yards. If they don't, we may be 4-5 yards.
YPC is not nearly the be-all, end-all stat you're trying to make it out to be. The actual yardage distribution matters a lot more than the arithmetic mean.Yeah let’s not count Chubb’s 90 yard touchdown & he is still averaging far more yards per carry than Michel.
Chubb looks much more athletic and faster.
Hope we’re not looking at another Carlos Dunlap/Jermaine Cunningham situation
Scott. GTFO with this nonsense! 21 years ago? Come on Son!!! (Runs to google Robert Edwards) OMG....I’m getting really old.Do me a favor, watch his college videos. Tell me you don't see anything special and he doesn't make people miss. It's obvious he's not as healthy as he was his last year of college. He's got excellent shiftyness, good speed, and he was plenty special in college. You can tell the difference between college and his 1st year in the NFL, and that difference is ONE thing, health. And yet, he's still 4th in rushing for rookies despite missing 3 1/2 games.
Go back and watch that Jet's game. You can tell he was getting healthy. Some of the shiftyness and speed, and power was coming back. He hasn't had success against 2 very good defensive lines the last 2 games. But three 100 yard games in 9 full games is pretty damned good for a rookie. Had 98 in another.
You guys are acting like he's a bust for Christ's sake. And you're acting like he can't become better than what he's shown. He's gonna finish with at least 800 yards as a rookie, when's the last Pat's rookie to do that ? Here's a hint, It was 21 seasons ago.
Where should we use Develin? Maybe we need Bolden back?
Are you really convinced that Michel would've scored on each and every one of those TD runs? I'm not.Don’t quote me on this but I’m pretty sure McCoy didn’t have 4 TDs vultured by a fullback.
Are you really convinced that Michel would've scored on each and every one of those TD runs? I'm not.
YPC is not nearly the be-all, end-all stat you're trying to make it out to be. The actual yardage distribution matters a lot more than the arithmetic mean.
To take a silly extreme, a RB who always gets a constant 2.6 yards every time he carries the ball is the most valuable player in the league since you can run 4 times to move the chains over and over and over again and score on every drive. By contrast, a RB who gets 30yd every sixth time he carries and gets stuffed for a 2yd loss the other five times averages almost a full yard more per carry than the first guy, but isn't remotely as valuable as the first guy.
Michael is a playmaker especially in space.
However he does not really do well between the tackles.
So let me get this straight.
A guy who gets 2.6 yards per carry consistently Is more valuable than a guy who gets 5.3 yards average per carry?
Is a guy who gets 5 touchdowns more valuable than a guy with 10 touchdowns too?
I assume you are saying Michel get’s more consistent yards.
Then why does he struggle getting 3rd or 4th down and 1 yard, if he is so consistent ?
They have gone to Develin in recent weeks to get the tough 1 yard at the goal line, because Michel has struggled in that situation.
He's not worthy of a first round pick as of right now, and I'd love to be proven wrong. Nick Chubb was available without any of the injury concerns Michel has and so far has been more productive than Michel. Phillip Lindsay went undrafted and is already over 1000 scrimmage yards and 10 TDs.
Which is a part of the reason why I am against drafting RBs in the first round. There will always be good RBs in later rounds, why bother wasting a first round pick on RB especially in the current NFL in which passing is king? Unless the RB is a generational talent (ex. Barkley, Fournette, Gurley, etc.) who is a consensus early first round pick, teams should never waste first round picks on RBs. Michel is not a generational talent and should not have been drafted this early, especially with all the injury issues he had in college.
I don't mean to be rude, but do you know anything about statistics? Looking at the arithmetic mean is a poor way to analyze numbers when you're concerned about the success of the individual plays, not the big picture aggregate. Michel has a more even distribution (and a higher success rate in terms of actual vs expected yards given down and distance, etc) than Chubb.
He's not struggling to get first downs, either. I already posted that he is tied for 12th in the league in overall first downs (and up there for first down percentage). He's performing like a starting RB, and fairly comfortably in the top 12 - 15 in most metrics per game. He's not a superstar, but the offense performs better when he's getting touches.
I like both players. Of course we'd prefer that our guy gets more TDs. But you're relying on a few stuffs to make up your mind, when the numbers actually show the opposite.