Joey007
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2010
- Messages
- 15,952
- Reaction score
- 21,009
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Whats the word on Jordan Matthews?
I was amazed when in 1984 the Pats used the number one pick in the entire draft on a wide receiver, Irving Fryar. It has only happened four times in the history of the NFL.We have not drafted a 1st round WR in Belichick's entire tenure.
Dorsett can do what Cooks does for substantially less money, guys like Riley McCarron can make the team now.
Our GM is wicked smart...
Jackson?Patriots are in a good position to take a quarterback like Lamar Jackson and still fill needs with a top-tier talent at the back end of the 1st round and in the 2nd. That makes me happy.
I liked Cooks a lot but he did some things that were maddening, like the ill-fated hurdle attempt and running backwards in the Super Bowl. He was a top-tier WR2, not a WR1, but he'll be paid like a WR1. The Patriots got a solid year out of him and actually returned a higher pick than they lost. I can't complain about the trade, though it certainly makes the return on something like the Garoppolo trade even more of a headscratcher.
The WR corps isn't in a great spot, though. Edelman will be back but he's getting older. Hogan is a good but not great WR2. Maybe they're confident Mitchell will be healthy. Maybe they like Dorsett for some reason. Maybe they'll draft a DJ Moore or Anthony Miller. Maybe they'll pick up Jordan Matthew's or Jeremy Maclin. Maybe they'll trade for Beckham. Who knows, but the current slate of WRs do leave me nervous.
Another Cooks basher.
He traded him b/c he wasn't going to pay him $14m a year.
Three observations on your three observations:
1. While the Rams are building a "so-called" All-Star team, BB and the Patriots are retooling a roster to make yet, another run at the Superbowl.
2. Hard not to like this trade. The Pats never would've paid Cooks what he was looking for after this year and we just got back our 1st that we traded for him last year.
3. If you think BB is trolling Brady and "sour" about having to trade JG, then you haven't been paying attention and either don't know sh!t about the Patriots or just another troll.
Mentioned a trade with Bengals today and Cooks and A.J. Green. Anybody thinking Green?Yeah..trade a guy because we cound't afford him next year..to get a head case and to pay that guy even more
No he would not have. Bill would never pay a WR top money. EverHe would have if he was worth it.
Which he isn't.
Because we saw that all season long.
That guy has been first on a lot of stuff before.
DT - Shelton, Brown, Valentine, Lawrence, ButlerI know the team needs a QB and a LT but with 5 picks in the top 100 if 3 of those players arent in the front 7 I'm gonna staple my head to the carpet
No he would not have. Bill would never pay a WR top money. Ever
No he would not have. Bill would never pay a WR top money. Ever
An ok groupDT - Shelton, Brown, Valentine, Lawrence, Butler
DE - Clayborn, Flowers, Wise, Rivers, Grissom, Lee, Davis
Maybe Cooks was not on the TB12 Method?How long before the BS (Boston Sports) Talk mediots start the "Brady complains to Kraft about losing Cooks" rumors?
Great signing. He's always killed us. He's younger than Edelman and Dola.Eric Decker on line 1?
Watch them sign Decker on the cheap...lol.
I think Bill thought there was a chance he could keep Cooks but as the WR market developed he gave up.So he traded for him last year known he was gonna trade him this year.
Either way he wasnt long term for bill. I'm fine with it. He didnt shine here like some said he would.
True. When Cookie got hurt in the Super Bowl, Dorsett came in and filled his shoes seamlessly. Brady threw like 500 yards and Dorsett was hauling in tons of those and took the top off secondary defense big time.