- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 68,319
- Reaction score
- 105,251
It really needs to happen.Please cut Richards next
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.It really needs to happen.Please cut Richards next
No but it opens up a roster spot for a better playerThat bag of buscuits savings on the cap could go a long way in feeding someone's family.
Need to wait.Allen needs to go next.
He must have more damning pictures than Bequette. Not only does he continually make the team, he gets playing time on defense.It really needs to happen.
Thanks! Appreciate it!Wow, great comeback champ. Rapier wit. Well done.
No but it opens up a roster spot for a better player
At this stage though? I don't agree it does. The 90th guy we'll bring into camp has no shot at being a better player than Richards, who at least has ST value.
I meant on the 53.
To take that further I would cut him now.
I am so done with his bad angles and abysmal coverage ability
You didn't misread. I didn't state it explicitly.Ah, okay, my misread on that then. I would agree with your comment on the 53. I still wouldn't cut him now, as there are spots on the team for ST's only players, and at least we know he can do that if there are injuries. But I would be disappointed if someone with higher defensive upside doesn't win the job from him in the end.
You didn't misread. I didn't state it explicitly.
Agree. Cutting him now does not make sense. I just don't want him on the team even if he was playing for free.
I'm just done with him.I thought Richards was a player for philly in disguise
He must have more damning pictures than Bequette. Not only does he continually make the team, he gets playing time on defense.
I thought Richards was a player for philly in disguise
Which makes one wonder is the game passing BB by?? I think when BB Scouted Richards he fell in love with his intelligence as a human being...but that didn't translate to Football intelligence on the playing Field.
...or the man who signed him to the contract.Don't hate the man, hate the contract...
...or the man who signed him to the contract.
It's a goddamn mystery to me how this kid takes great angles and shows good coverage ability in practice but craps his pants in games.My purely wild speculation is that Richards is one of those players that impresses in every area leading up to a game, and then just lacks the athleticism or "it" factor to excel when it actually counts (at least on defense). Given how much stock BB puts into practice performance, I think he's just stuck in one of those loops where he keeps thinking, "Okay, NOW he's got it" and it just never pans out.
It's a goddamn mystery to me how this kid takes great angles and shows good coverage ability in practice but craps his pants in games.
But that is still something that shows up eventually. 1000 practices. Dozens of games.Different level of intensity, could be overthinking once in the game, who knows. Could also be an element where his ability to recognize things works exceptionally well when it's people he's practicing against every day (hence, looks great), but give him new players and his lack of pop really stands out. At this point, I'll believe anything if it explains him.