- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 68,311
- Reaction score
- 105,241
Thanks for explaining. I mostly agree.
Not to nitpick - just want to point out where our differing interpretations lie. Curran doesn't say in this piece that Tom went back door asking for loyalty and a new contract - he says:
I get what you are saying and I am blending Wickerdick, Bedard and Curran here as the narrative of all three are, "Tom went to Kraft and asked where his loyalty is because he took a discount, you still have Jimmy and the best way to demonstrate that was he wanted a new deal. " It just seems like Tom is bellyaching and I don't think he is a whiner.
he also writes:
Which I think is more about demonstrating why Brady would be valid in being frustrated - a broken handshake agreement (alleged) with the guy who's a second father figure.
More broadly, I think Curran wrote this piece to show that, even though Brady knows this is a business and people get released and traded almost every week, doesn't also mean that he has to be happy about that becoming his fate too. I don't think that makes Tom look gullible or disingenuous.
I don't think Tom needs to play loyal soldier and keep his mouth shut but the characterizations by Sham and Curran make Tom out to be hurt, angry and disgruntled which I believe to be a huge exaggeration and stated for maximum emotional impact on readers like myself. It worked.
Last edited: