Literally OFFERING you the last word but you chose not to take it.
What the hell does that mean ? You are 'literally offering' the last word, which I took, and then you are taking it away ?
You are kidding right? You saw the game I assume. Are you honestly telling me you are going to reduce how they played to a formula designed to give people who don’t understand football a way to compare different qb statistics?
I saw the game. I saw one bonehead play, but I aso saw a passing TD (which the Pats didn't do very often in their last 8 games of that season) and a very clutch 3rd down throw to Brown (I think it was on a 3rd and 8) that allowed the Pats to milk the clock after.
Didn't play a good game, but it wasn't horrible either, as you stated. You are the one on record saying it was horrible, yet you have mentioned only 1 play to backup your argument. And again, the Pats coaching staff wasn't as harsh as you are.
There is obviously no point in continuing this. You are now the only person I have met ehibthinks Drew Bledsoe played well in that game.
Never said that Bledsoe played well. It wasn't even the point of the argument. I pointed out that your post saying that Huard would probably have done better than Bledsoe wasn't even remotely objective at best.
I have no interest in continuing to have a football discussion that devolves to abandoning all analysis to use a formula designed for novices.
So numbers don't lie except when they don't fit your argument. Okay, got it.
I'm wondering how many people on this board can actually calculate a QB rating themselves...you know, since it's for novice it should be pretty simple for most hardcore football fan to provide the calculation....just sayin'.
Yeah because I said that didn’t I.
The obvious is the Bledsoe played like crap and the patriots won in spite of him and almost certainly huard would have played as well better but instead you argue Bledsoe must have played well because belichick decided to put him in.
Well, I can't read you mind, so no, I didn't know what the obvious was to you.
And I'll tell you what you told another poster. READ. I never argued that Bledsoe must have played well because Belichick decided to put him in. All I said was that, at the time, Belichick played Bledsoe because he thought that what was best for the team. And that meant that Belichick thought Bledsoe was a better option than Huard was.
This is pointless. Have your beloved last word.
I'm taking it now. Will you take it away this time too ?