TinhWoodhead
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2011
- Messages
- 4,610
- Reaction score
- 4,967
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.What are you talking about?!The other coaches don't have the IQ level and commitment belichick does. It sounds harsh but it's true.
Why hasn't the Patriots' philosophy caught on in the NFL?
Well, Belichick IS the philosophy. While he certainly wouldn't have 5 without Brady, I think its fair to say that BB probably would still have had the most successful run in the NFL (or close to it) with someone else. Keeping in mind that whoever that would be would have been coached, prepared, held to standards, and engulfed in the system and schemes, which would have elevated whoever eventually became acceptable to somewhere between what they are and what Brady is."Have Bill Belichick and Tom Brady" isn't a copyable philosophy.
Well, Belichick IS the philosophy. While he certainly wouldn't have 5 without Brady, I think its fair to say that BB probably would still have had the most successful run in the NFL (or close to it) with someone else.
That's true, but I was referring more to coaches and front office folks.
I think it has tried to be replicated. But I keep coming back to Brady and Belichick, in that order. They are special. Belichick not only knows the X's and O's better than anyone, but he is also a great leader. He has created a selfless, winning atmosphere and gets along with his players. They want to play for him, which may surprise some because he comes across as stiff and unlikeable personality wise but inside the locker room and meeting room we know that isn't true. He does all of it well. Extremely detail oriented too.Usually when someone is successful, other people try and copy it. Like, when Apple introduced the iPhone, a bunch of other manufacturers soon introduced similar phones.
In football that doesn't seem to apply. The Patriots have been successful, but nobody is copying their philosophy:
- The Patriots have had success with a smart pocket quarterback. Do teams copy that? Not at all. Every team seems to want a quarterback as big, strong and fast as possible.
- The Patriots have had success with a complex offense based on timing and reads. Does anyone copy that? Almost nobody.
- The Patriots have had success hiring players who want to win, not chase statistics. Does anyone else copy that philosophy? Not to my knowledge.
- The Patriots have had success hiring a head coach with a profound understanding of football, rather than a cheerleader. Does anyone else copy that? Almost nobody - owners all want the Hollywood coach who makes a lot of moving speeches and is "good with players".
- The Patriots have success not paying ridiculous contracts, but focusing on team strength. Again, nobody, or almost nobody, seems to even try to copy it.
I'm not saying every team should be a clone of the Patriots. But why doesn't some other team at least try to adopt some of the philosophy that was successful over nearly two decades for the Patriots?
Not really.Belichick's solo history strongly suggests otherwise.
Not really.
He built up a terrible Cleveland team into a playoff team before Modell moved them. Had they stayed in Cleveland he was on the right path.
He 'solo' history here was the 2000 season, when he ripped apart a roster, and started rebuilding the roster, the culture and the approach.
The 16 years since have an awful lot of good coaching and decisions, that aren't all Tom Brady.
I'll put it another way, there is no way in hell Tom Brady has 5 rings with any other coach/franchise.
He went 11-5 with a QB who hadn't played since high school.Yes, really. And you omitted 2008, when he coached a team that had been 18-1 the year before, and failed to make the playoffs. You've got no history based argument here, at all. You've got "But moving forward", which would be at least arguable, but you've not nothing history based.