- Joined
- Apr 3, 2006
- Messages
- 26,101
- Reaction score
- 52,115
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I LOL'd when I read that.
I have never seen "Belichick" and "panache" on the same computer screen together.
Goodell: "Uh, well....you are doing it with too much panache."
Goodell: "I'm fining you a 1st rd pick and and $1m."
BB: "Why?"
Goodell: "You are violating the spirit of the new kickoff policy"
BB: "What does one do to violate the spirit of the policy?"
Goodell: "Uh, well....you are doing it with too much panache."
This is how it all begins. Goodell will now send out a "memo" to teams to stop doing it, BB will say no I'm following the rules as they're spelled out, Goodell then punishes BB/Pats for violating the spirit of the rule.
Zero panache.
If this isn't the very definition of panache then Cyrano didn't have a long nose.
I'd be shocked if he knew the actual definition of panache.Like Goodell would know the difference between panache and a pancake.
It really is remarkable. I'm out of words.You can't make this stuff up people.
It is fairly complimentary and tongue-in-cheek in some areas.The knee jerk anger in this thread makes me I wonder how many here read the article. It's quite complimentary of Belichick and the Pats. Helps to know what we're yelling about...
The headline is click bait. The author was interviewed Saturday morning on Gasper and Murrayy. The piece was complimentary toward BB and the author was as well during the interview. The author didn't create the headline.The knee jerk anger in this thread makes me I wonder how many here read the article. It's quite complimentary of Belichick and the Pats. Helps to know what we're yelling about...
The knee jerk anger in this thread makes me I wonder how many here read the article. It's quite complimentary of Belichick and the Pats. Helps to know what we're yelling about...