Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
Eli is the only one that seems alright, I think the refusal to play for the Chargers was more on Archie than it was Eli.
Florio's take is stupid. He's saying "oh, yeah, well it's a one-sided document! It was written by the accuser's lawyers! Of course it paints the defendant in a bad light!"
The thing is, you'd think if he was trying to drive a "black lives matter" agenda, he would've put a much heavier emphasis on the "blame it on a black kid" stuff. But it was barely mentioned.
I'm saying that Florio sounds idiotic claiming this isn't a big deal because the source documents were written by the accuser's lawyers because the NYJFL and Wells did the same exact thing to Brady and he didn't seem to have the same take then. He wasn't a big NYJFL proponent either, but he certainly didn't say "eh, I wouldn't put much stock in this deflate gate business."
One thing's for sure, Peyton must have done something. When there's smoke there is always fire no matter what evidence might say.
I'm saying Florio is trying to put Peyton in a bit more of a positive light by saying the court documents were biased, but did not do the same for Brady when he was slammed by equally biased court documents.
