Bhelmet
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2012
- Messages
- 1,070
- Reaction score
- 4
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Also, look for a surprise trade. Maybe even Mankins, who hasn't really delivered on his huge contract. When he was out this year his back-ups performed well for a lot less money.
.
Don't really want him back.
couldn't find the question "what does JackBauer want?' anywhere
No to Arrington.
NE needs to get better here because the likelihood of the 3rd CB pressed into the starting role is so great. Arrington isnt the # 1 or # 2 CB for a reason.
No to Vollmer
Hes never been healthy. Investing in him isnt worth the risk.
No to Chung
The Pats should just let this mistake expire with no offer. Move on and draft a real Safety who can cover. Its suppose to be a good draft for Safeties.
No to Hooman
Ballard will bring more to the table.
No to Woody
I wish NE could keep him, but Vereen is the same player and NE needs a big bruiser at RB.
Yes to Welker
For the right price though. NE was able to use Edelman and Welker together. One backs up the other should injury occur. Brady wants Wes back and I wouldnt be surprised if he gave up $ so WW could stay.
Yes to Edelman
Special teams is better with him. He needs to play less recklessly to save his body.
Yes to Talib
Corners are so hard to find and especially for this team. Talib is part of the solution to fixing NE pass defense.
I can agree, but I would keep Woody. Even if that meant losing WW - Woody, Vereen, and Edelman could make up for his production. I think Tom really likes Woody as well.
Trading Mankins would cost the Pats $12M against the cap to trade, which is $2M more than he'd cost to keep. Not happening.Also, look for a surprise trade. Maybe even Mankins, who hasn't really delivered on his huge contract. When he was out this year his back-ups performed well for a lot less money.
BB doesn't have many quality draft picks this year, and it'll take a big trade to get some.
No to Arrington.
NE needs to get better here because the likelihood of the 3rd CB pressed into the starting role is so great. Arrington isnt the # 1 or # 2 CB for a reason.
No to Vollmer
Hes never been healthy. Investing in him isnt worth the risk.
No to Chung
The Pats should just let this mistake expire with no offer. Move on and draft a real Safety who can cover. Its suppose to be a good draft for Safeties.
No to Hooman
Ballard will bring more to the table.
No to Woody
I wish NE could keep him, but Vereen is the same player and NE needs a big bruiser at RB.
Yes to Welker
For the right price though. NE was able to use Edelman and Welker together. One backs up the other should injury occur. Brady wants Wes back and I wouldnt be surprised if he gave up $ so WW could stay.
Yes to Edelman
Special teams is better with him. He needs to play less recklessly to save his body.
Yes to Talib
Corners are so hard to find and especially for this team. Talib is part of the solution to fixing NE pass defense.
I do not expect Woodhead to go. Other than that I agree, except that Vollmer might cost a bit more than you think.
If they keep Woodhead they will have
Ridley
Vereen
Woodhead
Bolden
Demps
There are only so many snaps to go around I don't see the value in keeping him. Unless we were to get some type of value in return and move Vereen or Bolden to a place looking for a #1 back.
If they keep Woodhead they will have
Ridley
Vereen
Woodhead
Bolden
Demps
There are only so many snaps to go around I don't see the value in keeping him. Unless we were to get some type of value in return and move Vereen or Bolden to a place looking for a #1 back.