I HATE RON BORGES.......however....

Hate Borges,but this is a great analysis of the Bears Game.

This was a HEAVYWEIGHT FIGHT.....
Mano v Mano.

http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/articles/2006/11/27/soundtrack_had_a_pounding_beat/

When Borgass doesn't write about BB, he writes some good stuff. His column Sunday, none was about the Patriots, was good stuff, IMO. But a writer shouldn't let his personal feelings about someone flood his writing like it does when BB is the subject.

I cant believe I am going to say this, but....good article!

I agreed with his view. Now, where's that other shoe coming from?--------

If he chooses to be objectionable, Borges is still the best local football writer. The others can be very informative and sometimes amusing...but none compare to the skill and depth Borges can reach ... if he chooses...of course.

For the fans sake...it would be nice to see more. Who is injured, who is in the doghouse, who is on the innactive list just doesn't do it for me. I like the indepth writing, the writing only years of experience can skillfully translate to words...I wish there were more.

I too enjoyed his take. Much better than the whole "sloppy game" angle.
The "sloppy" angle is kind of "uncomplimentary" of the victory, no?

Wrong is a very talented writer. And he knows what angle to take, even if it directly contradicts other opinions he's taken

That's what makes him wrong.

"On a day when they could have had impact players David Terrell or Koren Robinson or the second-best tackle in the draft in Kenyatta Walker, they took Georgia defensive tackle Richard Seymour, who had 1 sacks last season in the pass-happy SEC and is too tall to play tackle at 6-6 and too slow to play defensive end"

Like wrong said, it's all about the defense. LOL