PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Idle thoughts - pregame break down - Pats/Jets


Status
Not open for further replies.
Great post! like someone else said its one of the main reasons for being here.

Theres one thing i'd like to add though, and thats whats going on in the Jests locker room. All week long we've been hearing players and coaches STILL talking like nothing has happened, that they lost badly Monday night, they learned nothing. Also it seems the coaching staff has been fighting ...literally.

So i think this taken together gives the Pats and advantage, i think the jets are still over confident and also slightly in disarray.

The team has completely bought into Ryans hype and theres not enough time for them to un-learn it, from now until Sunday.
 
Last edited:
It seems that almost every year we split with the Jets, and more often than not it is not the home team that wins. Nevertheless, this is the last game I would bet on this Sunday. (there's also something foreboding to me about a 4:15 start--a murky hour)

Yup we are 13-3 against them in our last 16 meetings, seems 50/50 to me.
 
Great post!

Any thoughts on the wildcat? (1) The Ryan likes to surprise (he's predictably unpredictable) (2) It's not as though their QB is in great form (3) It might, at least, throw the Pats' D off balance in the early season.
 
Great post! like someone else said its one of the main reasons for being here.

Theres one thing i'd like to add though, and thats whats going on in the Jests locker room. All week long we've been hearing players and coaches STILL talking like nothing has happened, that they lost badly Monday night. Also it seems the coaching staff has been fighting ...literally.

So i think this taken together gives the Pats and advantage, i think the jets are still over confident and also slightly in disarray.


Plus, Jets had a short week.

Thanks for the excellent analysis Ken.

Considering how well Welker performed the last time against them - and how another poster pointed out that the Jets D is pretty much man to man -, what's the best way to neutralize Welker in our scheme?

Would doing the above affect the Jets current aggressive defensive strategy?
 
I have to disagree with the Jets offense isn't that bad. In the context of total yardage then no they are not that bad. But in the context of scoring, yes they are that bad. This team has an incredibly hard time scoring points.

Couple of things I don't think the Jets can do:

1. Sustain multiple long drives that result in TD's against a solid defense

2. Consistantly make 3rd and 5+, who is going to catch the ball? Edwards sucks, keller is ok but inconsistant. LT might be their best receiver. I understand Cotchery in the past but the biggest problem of all is they don't have a QB that can deliver the football with any consitancy or accuracy.

3. I think Slausson is going to be abused all day on Sunday, especially in running situations I fully expect a 4 man line on early downs and after watching Slausson get abused in the pre-season and on Monday night, why not put Vince right over him when they go with a 4 front? It would force Mangold to assist Slausson. Leaving the delayed blitz right up the middle with Spikes/Chung wide open. I have a feeling it is going to be a loooong day for Sanchez.

4. I don't think the Jets will be able to get to Brady as often as they need to in order to slow down the passing game. And their secondary outside of Revis and Leonard is garbage. I like Leonard,tough dude etc...but he (as several posters have pointed out) is a mismatch against any of our TE's. As a matter of fact it is a mismatch every where you look in that secondary outside of Revis. And to be honest I hope they get cute and put Revis on Welker, but I don't think Rex is thaaat stupid. But you are left to wonder at times.

5. Flacco killed the Jets on 3rd downs primarly due to the Jets blitz happy ways. Brady won't just get 1st downs in those situations he will strike for big yardage plays.
 
Last edited:
Jets fan here..

But, I think the Jets will bracket Welker as much as possible in the slot, not necessarily limiting his catches as much as trying to limit the YAC.

I think the big mismatch, and I was at the game Monday, is the Pats TE vs the Jets safety's. IF Brodney Pool does not play (questionable, DNP vs Ravens) then the Jets have NOONE who can match up against a big, physical TE. That was the one thing Kerry Rhodes actually did very well. Pool is supposed to replace that. But without him, the Jets have to match Smith or Leonard on a TE. And as tough as both guys are, neither has the natural athletic ability to math-up there. HUGE mismatch.

Every time the Ravens had to make a play, Heap was open. If Flacco was a little more accurate, Heap could have gone 10-130 easy.

As a Jets fan, Revis vs Moss is not the key. If Revis is healthy, he will at least slow down Randy to the point that he isn't a game breaker. And I think they learned their lesson with Welker last year.

It's your tight ends that scare me. The Jets need Pool to play to have a chance at slowing NE down. And since I have never really seen this cat play, who knows if he is even up to that challenge.



On offense, I expect the Jets to be much better this week. Not that that is saying much...eliminate penalties and stupid mistakes, put 17-21pts on the board, and lets see if Rex and his defense can win the game by holding the Pats to fg's (like 1st game last yr).


This all just makes too much sense.

YOU ARE OBVIOUSLY AN IMPOSTER !!!
 
Not only did Sanchez played poorly (and timidly) last week, he's also made some brash comments regarding this week's game. My guess is he's primed to force some throws downfield on Sunday. Look for NE to disguise coverages with the intent of trying to bait Sanchez into some poor decisions. An early interception may shatter his fragile psyche ...
 
1. We know from game one that even without Jenkins the Jets shut down completely a better running game than we have here.
Agreed, on both counts.

2. We also know that while the Jets D is a good one under any conditions, when they play at home that advantage is increased even more than usual for a home team. The reason is the style of D the Jets play. They do a great job of overloading and disguising their many blitzes...when the Jets play at home, the noise level makes communication MUCH MUCH more difficult...the point is, playing in NJ makes the likelihood of communications errors grow dramatically. AND the entire concept of the Jet defensive style depends on taking advantage of errors like this.
So While I would think this would be a double digit win at home. This is going to be a grind it out close game in NJ
Agreed. If the Pats have any hope at all of winning, they must take the crowd out as early as possible. The defense can help here, by frustating the Sancheck and turning the crowd against him.

3. So OK what do we do about it. Well the first thing that came to mind is the old Steeler strategy. Back in 2002-4 the Steelers were the team no one could run against. What did the Pats do? Simple, they refused to bang their head against the wall and spread them out went empty backfield and didn't run. :eek: A solution so simple it was genius. This negated the steelers biggest strength simply by formation and play selection and the Pats owned the Steelers during that era.
Now its not that simple to do that vs the Jets. Teams have had years to work on that offense and more and more you see teams pressure the QB and jump on the Pats short routes and do a much better job. They aren't always effective, but more now than then.
Agreed. This OL & this collection of JAGs & AARPs at RB will never ever run with success vs the jesters D.

4. Here's an idea - Have the Pats go 2 TEs empty backfield, and 3 WRs/TEs/RBs. here's the rationale:
a. By having 7 men across the LOS you make it more difficult to rush from the outside, simply because they have to go a longer distance. So if they rush more than you can block, the open guy has to run farther and the QB gains another second.
b. Uncovered TEs make great dump off receivers. And if they are uncovered they can attack the middle of the field faster than the D can get to the passer. That means most of the time the Jets will HAVE to cover and account for the TEs and thus have fewer rushers to apply pressure, and even if they do try and cover the TEs with LBs, the Pats win a lot of those individual match ups.
c. The 2 outside receivers spread the field and are now off the LOS which gives them more room for release, and thus in some way negate the Jets press coverage techniques.
d. The 3rd "slot" receiver gives the formation extreme flexibility depending on who is playing the position. You could put a Kevin Faulk in the position and motion him into the QB as a running threat as well as run screens and other patterns. You could have Hernandez there to create a match up problem if that receiver is covered by a smaller Wilson or Leonard. You put Tate on the outside and use Welker in the slot as we have seen for the last 3 years. Lots of options.
e. The formation is balanced, which makes it harder to defend. The 7 men on the LOS make it hard to rush the passer. The 2 wide outs spread the field. All together a tough assignment for a DC. Stronger vs the Pass rush. Flexible enough to attack man to man coverage. Bottom line - I'd love to see it.
Agreed. Throwing the ball but with 6/7-man lines + an RB for blitz pickup is the only way the Pats will score points, and keep Brady healthy.

4. Regardless of what formations the Pats use this game, I think we all agree that a good part of the Pats strategy will be to create match up advantages with our TEs. Hernandez is too big for their DBs and too Fast for their LBs. Alge won't run away from anyone, but is still a professional receiver who knows how to get position to catch the ball. Getting a Gronk/Leonard match up should be major a goal, because it would just be unfair. Any of our TEs on Leonard is unfair, but if they could get Gronk on Leonard consistently, it would be so unfair that the NFL would have to call in a rules change. ;).
Agreed. This game will be won by the OL, Brady, the TEs, Faulk, WW & WW2; Moss & the other RBs will be useless.

5. This is a game I REALLY want to win the toss and defer. Just as I assume if the Jets win the toss THEY will want to KO. The crowd will be at its most emotional and loudest to open the game. I know it would be great to just march down the field and shut them up, but that would be a tall order. I'd much rather get the extra possession in the 2nd half after you have had a half to see what the Jets are doing on D, and the Crown noise is down by a few decibels.
Agreed.

6. Finally on offense, we cannot turn the ball over more than the Jets. If they have a 3-1 TO advantage as they did on Monday, they will win this game.
Fixed it for you.

7. Now to the Jets offense. I know it would be real easy for a Pats fan to be smug about the Jets offense after last Monday. That would be a mistake. There is no way that the Jets are going to be as bad as that historic offensive disaster. They aren't THAT bad, and at this stage of the game, the Pats defense (especially the front 7) isn't as good as the Ravens front 7. So don't be shocked to see the Jets move the ball some and score some points.
Agreed. Our DEs & OLBs will eventually be exposed, perhaps as soon as this weekend.

8 Common wisdom would dictate the Pats start their defensive strategy by putting 8 men in the box, shut down the running game and force Sanchez to beat you. Based on last game, how could you come to any other conclusion.
Obviously the Jets know this as well. Their coaches also get paid a lot of money too, so NO ONE should be shocked to see,Sanchez going deep down the sidelines to Edwards or trying to hit Keller up the deep middle a couple of times in the first quarter. However I'm pretty sure the main thrust of the Jets passing attack with be to hit Cotchery over the middle 12-14 yds deep and their RBs (especially LT) out of the backfield.....and of course RUN THE BALL.
They are obviously going to let Sanchez throw the ball down the field more this game, but they STILL don't want to see him over 30 attempts, so the Pats will definitely see the run.
Agreed.

9. While the Jet OL looked more vulnerable to the Pass rush than last year, and there is a lot of talk about the weakness of Slauson and the deterioration of Woody. All of this is true, HOWEVER the Pats don't have anyone like T Suggs, or a DE as good as HNgata. So the rush will have to be created by scheme more than individual battles.
I would be happy to see the Pats DL stay aggressive and attack the LOS more then we have seen with the standard 2 gap. I want the DBs to play more man to man or 5 under tight zones than we usually see. And finally I want to see more of that good tackling that limit even the good plays and force the offence to line up and perform. Make the Jets EARN every yard, every first down, every score.
I don't think the Jet offense is good enough to sustain more than two 10+ play scoring drives, without self destructing, and 14 points isn't going to win this game, so limiting the "big play" (25+yds) is critical...to both teams.
Agreed. If our D allows big plays, we will lose.

10. Don't fall asleep on the special teams battle - The Pats return game wasn't a one game fluke, they have had several long punt and KO returns throughout the preseason. It is now a serious threat. However the Jet coverage teams were also excellent in the first game. We all know in a close game, special teams is where games are won or lost. We shouldn't ignore it amid the other more dramatic but less important to the game story lines.
Agreed. Not allowing big returns by the jesters will give our D more chances to force TOs by the Sancheck, and will help take the crowd out of the game.

11. As a Pats fan, here is my biggest concern for this game. Historically it hasn't been wise to bet against the team that is viewed the most "desperate". It's even less wise to bet against a HOME team who is the most "desperate", AND even though its early in the season, and the Pats have had 3 superbowl teams that started 0-2 or 1-3, make no mistake about it, the Jets are a "desperate" team. They wouldn't just be 0-2 but they'd be 0-2 with 2 home losses, 2 conference losses, and heading down to Miami.....OUCH.
That makes this a MUST win, and while I can see a lot of positive aspects to this game and fully expect the Pats to win.....I can't get this old football adage out of my head and it worries me.
It worries me too, a lot; esp. when taking the Pats' putrid road record last year into account.

12. Well now its on to Sunday and the melodrama that will play out on the field. And its going exciting and interesting story to see. Let me know what you think, because that's all I got between now an 1pm Sunday. :D

Not much with which we disagree here. One other note: Mr. Clutch Gostkowski must make all of his FG attempts, not just the RZ bunnies to which he's become accustomed.
 
I have to disagree with the Jets offense isn't that bad. In the context of total yardage then no they are not that bad. But in the context of scoring, yes they are that bad. This team has an incredibly hard time scoring points.

Couple of things I don't think the Jets can do:

1. Sustain multiple long drives that result in TD's against a solid defense

2. Consistantly make 3rd and 5+, who is going to catch the ball? Edwards sucks, keller is ok but inconsistant. LT might be their best receiver. I understand Cotchery in the past but the biggest problem of all is they don't have a QB that can deliver the football with any consitancy or accuracy.

3. I think Slausson is going to be abused all day on Sunday, especially in running situations I fully expect a 4 man line on early downs and after watching Slausson get abused in the pre-season and on Monday night, why not put Vince right over him when they go with a 4 front? It would force Mangold to assist Slausson. Leaving the delayed blitz right up the middle with Spikes/Chung wide open. I have a feeling it is going to be a loooong day for Sanchez.

4. I don't think the Jets will be able to get to Brady as often as they need to in order to slow down the passing game. And their secondary outside of Revis and Leonard is garbage. I like Leonard,tough dude etc...but he (as several posters have pointed out) is a mismatch against any of our TE's. As a matter of fact it is a mismatch every where you look in that secondary outside of Revis. And to be honest I hope they get cute and put Revis on Welker, but I don't think Rex is thaaat stupid. But you are left to wonder at times.

5. Flacco killed the Jets on 3rd downs primarly due to the Jets blitz happy ways. Brady won't just get 1st downs in those situations he will strike for big yardage plays.


great post sir
 
This all just makes too much sense.

YOU ARE OBVIOUSLY AN IMPOSTER !!!


My thoughts exactly. However, since every other word isn't "f^%#" or "s*&@", he's probably banned from ganggreen and jetsinsider.

Personally, I don't see the Jets defense as problematic in the same way the Steelers defense is a problem.

These attacking defenses are great because they pad their stats against inferior opponents.

However, as they say, that's why you play the game.
 
Jets fan here..
...
I think the big mismatch, and I was at the game Monday, is the Pats TE vs the Jets safety's. IF Brodney Pool does not play (questionable, DNP vs Ravens) then the Jets have NOONE who can match up against a big, physical TE.

Agreed, and not-so-coincidentally, TE is the position where the Pats' roster is most dramatically improved from 2009. As a group, Hernandez, Gronkowski and Crumpler give you every possible set of TE skills and physical attributes to contend with.

BTW, welcome. Folks who actually want to talk football are valued here, even if they show the poor fashion taste to wear green. ;)
 
Jets fan here..

But, I think the Jets will bracket Welker as much as possible in the slot, not necessarily limiting his catches as much as trying to limit the YAC.

I think the big mismatch, and I was at the game Monday, is the Pats TE vs the Jets safety's. IF Brodney Pool does not play (questionable, DNP vs Ravens) then the Jets have NOONE who can match up against a big, physical TE. That was the one thing Kerry Rhodes actually did very well. Pool is supposed to replace that. But without him, the Jets have to match Smith or Leonard on a TE. And as tough as both guys are, neither has the natural athletic ability to math-up there. HUGE mismatch.

Every time the Ravens had to make a play, Heap was open. If Flacco was a little more accurate, Heap could have gone 10-130 easy.

As a Jets fan, Revis vs Moss is not the key. If Revis is healthy, he will at least slow down Randy to the point that he isn't a game breaker. And I think they learned their lesson with Welker last year.

It's your tight ends that scare me. The Jets need Pool to play to have a chance at slowing NE down. And since I have never really seen this cat play, who knows if he is even up to that challenge.



On offense, I expect the Jets to be much better this week. Not that that is saying much...eliminate penalties and stupid mistakes, put 17-21pts on the board, and lets see if Rex and his defense can win the game by holding the Pats to fg's (like 1st game last yr).

Those are good insights. I agree that Revis vs. Moss is not going to be the key to the game. It's the matchup the media likes to play up, but in my opinion will not really have an impact on the game, unless it is close.

Like you said, Heap was hard to stop when he was hitting the seam because he was severely mismatched, and so my money is on Gronk. On their last drive, the Ravens made a point of going to Heap again and again. I think that was a card they had up their sleeve, that got them ahead in the score.

Honestly if Ryan is going to play the 46, he is going to lose this Sunday. There is a reason it quickly fell out of vogue after the Bears used it, and it wasn't just because you have to have a very talented secondary, but because any QB with a quick release and accuracy can defeat it, and Brady is one of the best at both. He got flummoxed in the first game- his first exposure to that style of defense, and we know it will never happen again. He has too much pride. He will pick the 46 apart, period.

If I were Ryan, I would fall back to the hybrid 3-4 or at least go with the TNT formation in the 46 (Tackle-Nose-Tackle) so you can have enough LB's to 3 and 5 tech, and cover the flats, and allow the backfield to get away with a cover 3.
 
Those are good insights. I agree that Revis vs. Moss is not going to be the key to the game. It's the matchup the media likes to play up, but in my opinion will not really have an impact on the game, unless it is close.

Like you said, Heap was hard to stop when he was hitting the seam because he was severely mismatched, and so my money is on Gronk. On their last drive, the Ravens made a point of going to Heap again and again. I think that was a card they had up their sleeve, that got them ahead in the score.

Honestly if Ryan is going to play the 46, he is going to lose this Sunday. There is a reason it quickly fell out of vogue after the Bears used it, and it wasn't just because you have to have a very talented secondary, but because any QB with a quick release and accuracy can defeat it, and Brady is one of the best at both. He got flummoxed in the first game- his first exposure to that style of defense, and we know it will never happen again. He has too much pride. He will pick the 46 apart, period.

If I were Ryan, I would fall back to the hybrid 3-4 or at least go with the TNT formation in the 46 (Tackle-Nose-Tackle) so you can have enough LB's to 3 and 5 tech, and cover the flats, and allow the backfield to get away with a cover 3.

psycho

Is "TNT" essentially going zone? Even with the rookie getting the toast treament on Monday, it seemed Wrecks never changed anything.
 
Key to this game is putting up 6 points every red zone trip. Hell, thats the key to the season! I have all the confidence in the world with Gostkowski, but multiple 3's aint good enough!

I'm really not too worried about Moss or Welker getting shut down. Both of them getting shut down the entire game is a big IF, and even if thats the case, Gronk, Tate and Edelman (if he plays) are more than capable of picking up the workload.

PS- First post by the way, and this place is awesome!
 
1. We know from game one that even without Jenkins the Jets shut down completely a better running game than we have here.

They stopped a better running game but an inferior offense overall. The Jets crashed their safeties because the Ravens don't have any real deep threats. They took the chance that they could cover 1-on-1 in case the Ravens went deep. In general they were correct since the CBs were there, but they didn't count on the flags or Boldin's superior body control and hands.

The Pats have multiple deep threats that should force the Jets to keep at least one safety deep. Other matchups will make them think twice about bringing the house against the run. So while your point is absolutely accurate, I'm not sure the situations translate 100%.

2. We also know that while the Jets D is a good one under any conditions, when they play at home that advantage is increased even more than usual for a home team. The reason is the style of D the Jets play. They do a great job of overloading and disguising their many blitzes. And the key elements of defeating that kind of D are recognition and communication.

Agree, but you are missing 2 more important elements...game plan and QB decision making. The Jets players aren't superhuman. They just force your offense to have the right plays called and execute them quickly. If you can do the former, you will have some success. If you can do both, they really don't have a chance since they leave gaping holes in the defense (be design) with the intention that you don't have the time or ability to attack them there.


a. By having 7 men across the LOS you make it more difficult to rush from the outside, simply because they have to go a longer distance. So if they rush more than you can block, the open guy has to run farther and the QB gains another second.

I see what you are saying but the Jets deliver more pressure from the inside than the outside...particularly with Pace out. I'm less worried about someone circling around the end than I am about a LB finding a hole in the middle of the line and getting an open shot at Brady. When he is in shotgun, I would feel better with a RB next to him for protection or a quick shuffle pass.

b. Uncovered TEs make great dump off receivers. And if they are uncovered they can attack the middle of the field faster than the D can get to the passer. That means most of the time the Jets will HAVE to cover and account for the TEs and thus have fewer rushers to apply pressure, and even if they do try and cover the TEs with LBs, the Pats win a lot of those individual match ups

That is a major difference from last year. Baker and Watson (who I'm convinced was injured throughout last year) were fine players but took an eternity to get open. Crumpler is kinda that way but the other two are legit threats if ignored or left to zone coverage.

5. This is a game I REALLY want to win the toss and defer. Just as I assume if the Jets win the toss THEY will want to KO. The crowd will be at its most emotional and loudest to open the game. I know it would be great to just march down the field and shut them up, but that would be a tall order. I'd much rather get the extra possession in the 2nd half after you have had a half to see what the Jets are doing on D, and the Crown noise is down by a few decibels[\QUOTE]

Agree, but there is never a time when I wouldn't want the Pats to defer. The chance run a 2 minute offense at the half and then get a Tate return and Brady back on the field after halftime is killer.

7. Now to the Jets offense. I know it would be real easy for a Pats fan to be smug about the Jets offense after last Monday. That would be a mistake. There is no way that the Jets are going to be as bad as that historic offensive disaster. They aren't THAT bad, and at this stage of the game, the Pats defense (especially the front 7) isn't as good as the Ravens front 7. So don't be shocked to see the Jets move the ball some and score some points

Agree with this as well. I don't think the Pats should be afraid of giving up a big play. I don't think the Jets will do well if the game turns into a track meet. It would be problematic if Sanchez can get in a 3.5 yard rhythm and kill the Pats with a million paper cuts.

10. Don't fall asleep on the special teams battle - The Pats return game wasn't a one game fluke, they have had several long punt and KO returns throughout the preseason. It is now a serious threat. However the Jet coverage teams were also excellent in the first game. We all know in a close game, special teams is where games are won or lost. We shouldn't ignore it amid the other more dramatic but less important to the game story lines

The Ravens ST were horrific in their decision making and execution. The Pats can't afford the same. Yards will likely be at a premium so winning ST will have a disproportionate impact on this game.

11. As a Pats fan, here is my biggest concern for this game. Historically it hasn't been wise to bet against the team that is viewed the most "desperate". It's even less wise to bet against a HOME team who is the most "desperate", AND even though its early in the season, and the Pats have had 3 superbowl teams that started 0-2 or 1-3, make no mistake about it, the Jets are a "desperate" team. They wouldn't just be 0-2 but they'd be 0-2 with 2 home losses, 2 conference losses, and heading down to Miami.....OUCH.

There is definitely blood in the water and this game should tell us the character of this team. If they come out and wait for Sanchez to lose the game, the result will likely be the opposite. Armed with a game plan and healthy, amped players looking to end the Jets season before summer ends, I like the Pats chances.
 
Last edited:
Nice Job Ken!

I'm trying not to overthink this one

The Jets can be as agressive as they want and Brady will find his dump pass options.

If they play more conservative Welker should be able to shred them. It's even better if the Revis hamstring issue is real.

I have a lot of confidence in our D against the Jets offense... Sanchez may indeed try to air it out more... but one quick interception is going to KILL his self confidence and ultimately may wind up defining his career even at this early stage, as he already has the reputation of a guy who can't handle pressure - and there's a LOT of pressure on him against the Pats in this game.

In a game where the Pats can get a 2 score lead, Sanchez and the Jets could very well fade as I'm confident our D can hold it.

The early part of this game will likely be most pivitol.
 
Key to this game is putting up 6 points every red zone trip. Hell, thats the key to the season! I have all the confidence in the world with Gostkowski, but multiple 3's aint good enough!

I'm really not too worried about Moss or Welker getting shut down. Both of them getting shut down the entire game is a big IF, and even if thats the case, Gronk, Tate and Edelman (if he plays) are more than capable of picking up the workload.

PS- First post by the way, and this place is awesome!

I think Gronk and Hernandez are the answers to you issue. Already Gronk has had 4 TDs in the Preseason and one in his first game. Hernandez also had chance in the endzone, but dropped it.

Both have slightly different skill sets, but BOTH are viable big targets in the red zone, and will vastly open the field for Moss in that respect
 
psycho

Is "TNT" essentially going zone? Even with the rookie getting the toast treament on Monday, it seemed Wrecks never changed anything.

The TNT will 2 gap, so all they will do is eat up blockers on the line. It can be zone or cover 0 under, with the LB's depending on the formation you see on offense. The main thing is this allows for a zone over (cover 3). With a cover 3 you at least can challenge the seam. With the base 46 (ETNE), you have nothing left for the seam which is where Gronk or presumably Hern will assassinate you.
 
The Pats have multiple deep threats that should force the Jets to keep at least one safety deep. Other matchups will make them think twice about bringing the house against the run. So while your point is absolutely accurate, I'm not sure the situations translate 100%.

No question that the Pats will at least pay lip service to the run, but if they don't have early success, I don't see them trying to reinvent the wheel, and I full expect to see Brady back in the gun on situations like 3rd and 2 (which btw still drives me crazy, but I'm getting used to it :) )

Agree, but you are missing 2 more important elements...game plan and QB decision making. The Jets players aren't superhuman. They just force your offense to have the right plays called and execute them quickly. If you can do the former, you will have some success. If you can do both, they really don't have a chance since they leave gaping holes in the defense (be design) with the intention that you don't have the time or ability to attack them there.

Oh, I'm very comfortable (as I said) with Brady making the right decisions in his reads. What worries me is getting that information to the rest of the offense. THAT'S the problem in that noisy stadium. If Brady makes a change and an OLman or WR doesn't get the message, bad things will happen. That's what the Jets D thrives on.

I see what you are saying but the Jets deliver more pressure from the inside than the outside...particularly with Pace out. I'm less worried about someone circling around the end than I am about a LB finding a hole in the middle of the line and getting an open shot at Brady. When he is in shotgun, I would feel better with a RB next to him for protection or a quick shuffle pass.

I see what you mean, but getting pressure up the middle is easier said than done, for any defensive Blitz. Besides LBs coming up the middle leaves the TEs wide open over the middle for dump offs. Its a risk reward thing.

That is a major difference from last year. Baker and Watson (who I'm convinced was injured throughout last year) were fine players but took an eternity to get open. Crumpler is kinda that way but the other two are legit threats if ignored or left to zone coverage.

Watson was a very decent TE, like Graham, but neither were what you would call "natural receivers". Guys who had the ability to effortlessly put their bodies in the best position to catch the ball while going full speed in your route. This is not about speed or hands. Its more about body control and hand-eye coordination.

Guys like Gonzales, Gates, and Clark have this ability. So far it looks like Gronk and Hernandez do too.......SO FAR.

Agree, but there is never a time when I wouldn't want the Pats to defer. The chance run a 2 minute offense at the half and then get a Tate return and Brady back on the field after halftime is killer.

Absolutely agree on this. I'd always rather have the ball first to start the 2nd half

Agree with this as well. I don't think the Pats should be afraid of giving up a big play. I don't think the Jets will do well if the game turns into a track meet. It would be problematic if Sanchez can get in a 3.5 yard rhythm and kill the Pats with a million paper cuts.

Well he didn't do a bad job of it in the first Jet-Pats game, especially when you consider it was his 2nd NFL game

The Ravens ST were horrific in their decision making and execution. The Pats can't afford the same. Yards will likely be at a premium so winning ST will have a disproportionate impact on this game.

I think this can be a big plus for the Pats

There is definitely blood in the water and this game should tell us the character of this team. If they come out and wait for Sanchez to lose the game, the result will likely be the opposite. Armed with a game plan and healthy, amped players looking to end the Jets season before summer ends, I like the Pats chances.

If the Pats can beat a good team, in a hostile environment, it will go a long way to convincing me and the rest of the nation that the Pats are true contenders this season. We all know the offense is good, but this D should be vastly improve as we go into December.
 
If the Pats can beat a good team, in a hostile environment, it will go a long way...

I think the importance of this game to the Patriots is being underestimated. It's a statement game. If they win, they're for real.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Patriots Kraft ‘Involved’ In Decision Making?  Zolak Says That’s Not the Case
MORSE: Final First Round Patriots Mock Draft
Slow Starts: Stark Contrast as Patriots Ponder Which Top QB To Draft
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/24: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/23: News and Notes
MORSE: Final 7 Round Patriots Mock Draft, Matthew Slater News
Bruschi’s Proudest Moment: Former LB Speaks to MusketFire’s Marshall in Recent Interview
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/22: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-21, Kraft-Belichick, A.J. Brown Trade?
MORSE: Patriots Draft Needs and Draft Related Info
Back
Top