JSn
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2008
- Messages
- 7,428
- Reaction score
- 1
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Ok, seriously - what's behind outlawing the Wedge?
Does anyone feel this limits the likelihood of KR's for TD's?
Ok, seriously - what's behind outlawing the Wedge?
Does anyone feel this limits the likelihood of KR's for TD's?
Here is the formal language for the rule change involving the wedge block being outlawed: “After the ball is kicked, no more than two receiving team players may intentionally form a wedge in an attempt to block for the runner. An illegal wedge is defined as three or more players lined up shoulder-to-shoulder within two yards of each other.”
Looks like they did not adopt the Tom Brady rule - But they did pass 4 others.
Four safety proposals passed at NFL owners meetings - ESPN
************, the last thing the Roy WIlliams law is about is "isolated incidents". There are all sorts of players out of football with leg and back injuries from being tackled that way.
If that makes it slightly clearer found it on PFT as for the impact yeah I'm not sure gunna have to read up on that.
The point of impact is the "wedge" — a wall of multiple blockers hoping to clear a path for the man returning the kick.
The collisions, with helmets dipped and absorbing an impact that places undue pressure on the C3-C4 range of the cervical spine, can be dangerous. At some point, the outcome could be fatal.
As a result, the Competition Committee has recommended outlawing the "wedge." It would be a great move.
Though it would make it more challenging for special teams coaches to devise strategies for advancing the ball as far as possible after a kickoff, it would help to ensure the safety of the men who have many years to spend as sons, husbands, and fathers after their playing careers end.
Looks like they did not adopt the Tom Brady rule - But they did pass 4 others.
Four safety proposals passed at NFL owners meetings - ESPN
It was an isolated case. It was geared to one player who was injuring players tackling that way. Fine or suspend the guy to deter it and don't penalize the rest of the defenders. It wouldn't be called the Roy Williams rule if it was as prevalent as you suggest. Roy Williams injured several players in one season which makes it an isolated case.
But if you don't like that example, how about the Emmitt Smith rule? Or the five yard chuck emphasis because of one playoff game between the Pats and Colt? There are plenty of reactionary rules that have been implemented over the years because of an isolated incident or player. Hence why there are rules named after players.
Didnt see this anywhere before:
Owners will implement rules changes but not to overtime
Guess the hit wasn't so "clean" after all.
That article was posted last week, before the owners' meetings even began, and it quite clearly says that the rule change was only going to be considered. Please don't start a new thread using an old story and consider it to be fact.
As stated in the merged thread, the NFL passed four safety rule changes today. Whether or not that includes the QB below-the-knees clarification is still unclear.
"Don't penalize the rest of the defenders?" What are you talking about? It doesn't penalize anyone, unless they tackle someone in a specific, completely unnecessary and highly dangerous way. If, as you say, it's an isolated case and Roy Williams is the only one doing it (your words, not mine), then nobody else is getting penalized for it, so your point is completely moot.
It's informally called the Roy Williams rule because Roy Williams does it all the time, and is the most prominent offender. Rules are oftentimes nicknamed to this effect: it says nothing of how prominent it is or is not. Bottom line: horse-collar tackling is unnecessary and highly likely to cause devastating damage to the player being tackled. It fits every definition of cheap and dirty, and its only advantage is that it allows you to drag a guy down after he's utterly beaten you. It ends careers, and there's absolutely no need for it.
The wedge blocking??? Bunching up on onside kicks? HAS that led to any serious injuries??
• Defenders who are knocked to the ground no longer can lunge into quarterbacks if the play is still going on. Kansas City safety Bernard Pollard did just that on the hit that ended Brady's season almost before it began, and NFL officiating director Mike Pereira placed such plays in the player safety category.
That adjustment was not a rule change and did not require an owners vote. But four other rules were adopted by the 32 teams.
• The initial force of a blindside block can't be delivered by a helmet, forearm or shoulder to an opponent's head or neck. An illegal blindside block will bring a 15-yard penalty.
• Initial contact to the head of a defenseless receiver also will draw a 15-yard penalty.
"Our clear movement is to getting out of the striking in the head area," Pereira said. "We're reading about injuries that say spinal and vertebrae. We've got to try something."
• On kickoffs, no blocking wedge of more than two players will be allowed.
• Also on kickoffs, the kicking team can't have more than five players bunched together pursuing an onside kick.