solman
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2007
- Messages
- 1,069
- Reaction score
- 0
Solman, do you think that your Brady proposal is in compliance with the CBA??
I have shown why I do not think that it is.
I think that my Brady proposal can in fact comply with the CBA.
Obviously, it can also be drafted in a way which does not comply with the CBA.
I'm debating the utility of drafting mock contractual language so we can get to the specifics.
Is it safe to say that we agree on these two points:
1. The 30% rule 8(b) in the CBA clearly excludes all compensation treated as a signing bonus.
2. 8(d) add back in a very narrow class of options (amongst them the Haynesworth bonus)
But disagree on this point?
3. You can draft a "guaranteed option" that is excluded by 8(b) and not included by 8(d).
Last edited: