Recent content by bombquixote

Broncos-24 Pats-20

If you'll recall, we bet $20 on the game--the loser would pay the winner's chosen charity. This means you owe the Nation Center for Family Literacy $20: http://www.famlit.org/ Been a pleasure. Maybe we can go double-or-nothing on next year's Bronco game at the blade.

Actually, if we play the Steelers the way we played you guys...then we'll have five take aways and win by 14.

Really? Maybe he can coach KC next year.

"Zero holding calls on the Broncos all night?? Did you WATCH the game? They could have flagged the Bronco line 20 times for BLATANT holds...." Maybe, but I was thinking the same thing about the Pats all through that game--like, was that pass protection or juijitsu?

Enough offense and defense to win the game. Not enough points, though, apparently. Look, a good team (which the Pats are) does not commit five turnovers (be they fumbles or interceptions) unless the opposing team is applying serious pressure--disrupting the qb's timing, consistently...

Well I, for one, plan on tormenting you guys for weeks after the Broncos spank you. :woohoo:

Hey Pats fans, the best therapy for troll irritation is becoming a troll yourself. You should head over to www.orangemane.com to chat with some Broncs fans. Barring idiots typical to any message board, the folks there are chill, respectful and pretty knowledgeable when it comes to football...

Does Denver count on those plays? I'm not sure I'd put it like that. I can say attempting those plays is almost always and integral part of Denver's game plan. What they count on is dominating the line of scrimage, making it necessary for the oponent to cheat a safety up to stop the run--and...

It's folly to equate 55-yard offensive gains with fumbles. Fumbles are luck. And although there may be luck involved in those offensive gains, they require planning, practice and execution--they are 100% intentional. They weren't accidents. Something in NE's defence made Denver's coaches...

Dude, shouldn't you be trolling the Steelers boards this week?

Right on. :eat3:

Ohmygod, you've exposed me! My statements were...yes, i confess *sob!*...OPINIONS! You don't miss a trick, Sherlock. Bet you could find bodies in a morgue, too. Yes, it's my opinion that this Pats team, while better than their 10-6 record indicates, are a far cry from last year's...

I'll see your Bread of Life and raise you a National Center for Family Literacy: http://www.famlit.org/ Whay say ye? 20 dolla?

Maybe. Then again: -This year's Pats are not as good as last year's. -Methinks Shanahan is slightly more creative than Cowher. -Denver has a better passing attack than did Pitt. -Denver's D (and this is most important) is really good, especially at home.