Welcome to PatsFans.com

Youtube joining the MSM

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by ELOrocks17, Oct 12, 2006.

  1. ELOrocks17

    ELOrocks17 Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

  2. Harry Boy

    Harry Boy Look Up, It's Amazing PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    40,216
    Likes Received:
    196
    Ratings:
    +667 / 2 / -9

    Look what the bastards did to Michelle Malikin "CENSORSHIP" these are the same scum that bleat, blabber and scream about "FREEDOM" they are PHONY SORE LOSING DOUBLE STANDARD LEFT WING LIBERAL
    F-CKING RAT BASTARDS.

    YOU TUBE IS SOCIALIST LIBERAL COMMUNIST BULLSH!T BILE PUS. YOU CAN ALL SHOVE YOU TUBE UP YOUR COMMUNIST LEFT WING AS$ES

    Enter Fox News pundit, author and top-rated blogger Michelle Malkin. Last week she received notice from YouTube, the world’s most popular video sharing service, that her video had been deemed “offensive.” The result? Her account was terminated and her videos deleted.

    http://www.examiner.com/a-339060~Ro...recognize_the_cost_of_conceding_Web_2_0_.html
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2006
  3. ELOrocks17

    ELOrocks17 Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Yup- and when you search for videos badmouthing Bush...it came up with 353 videos. Those are apparently not deemed offensive, but 1 video from bestselling author Malkin, and its lights out. that is total BULLSH*T!!
     
  4. Real World

    Real World Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    27,150
    Likes Received:
    223
    Ratings:
    +537 / 6 / -2


    GooTube is coming.


    Don’t think it matters? Consider that, according to USA Today, 98 percent of the money donated to political parties by Google employees — “Google Millionaires†— went to Democrats.


    Now, I know Dems are pro-free speech. Especially when one of their pundits is talking. But what amazes me about the fun loving owners of Google is that they talked a great game, and then we found out this:


    Google Agrees to Censor Results in China

    Jan 24 7:34 PM US/Eastern

    By MICHAEL LIEDTKE
    AP Business Writer

    SAN FRANCISCO

    Online search engine leader Google Inc. has agreed to censor its results in China, adhering to the country's free-speech restrictions in return for better access in the Internet's fastest growing market.


    Typical sell-outs.
     
  5. sdaniels7114

    sdaniels7114 Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    5,742
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0

    So now you nitwitcons wanna decided what's on Youtube's servers rather than Youtube? What's next? Are you gonna order John Stewart to stop being funny or something?
     
  6. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    24,873
    Likes Received:
    108
    Ratings:
    +240 / 8 / -13


    Just pointing out the hypocracy/slective outrage of lefties when it comes to free speech.
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2006
  7. ELOrocks17

    ELOrocks17 Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    No need to. John Stewart is about as funny as roofing tar.
     
  8. mikey

    mikey In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,422
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    Youtube is part of the Google empire.

    Google company's motto is: do no evil.

    Therefore, any "evil" deed will be excised from Youtube.

    The problem with Ms. Malkin is that she is offensive, obnoxious and repugnant. I think she should go back to her country where she came from.

    .
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2006
  9. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    24,873
    Likes Received:
    108
    Ratings:
    +240 / 8 / -13


    As opposed to ALL the other stuff on youtube....RIGHTTTTTTT!!!!!!!
     
  10. ELOrocks17

    ELOrocks17 Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Can you imagine the overwhelming outrage by the liberals if the same thing happened to Michael Moore or Jenine Garbageflo???
     
  11. sdaniels7114

    sdaniels7114 Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    5,742
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0

    Few nitwitcons can even operate a website, let alone build an empire as vast as Google. They haven't got the knack to move beyond AOL in my experience. So I don't envision a particularly similar situation; but if you're wondering if I would get upset if I learned that say Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity refused to allow Mike Moore or Jenine Garofolo to speak on their private air, I'd say no, not at all.

    This isn't about the first amendment or censorship. Anyone with any sense knows that whoever owns the medium is being censored if they don't have control over what goes out over it. This is about rejection. Specifically its about something you neo-nitwits like and enjoy (Youtube & Google) rejecting your point of view. The world's smallest Violin is playing now, in your honor.
     
  12. Harry Boy

    Harry Boy Look Up, It's Amazing PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    40,216
    Likes Received:
    196
    Ratings:
    +667 / 2 / -9

    Liberals can dish it out but they can't take it, freedom of speech to a liberal all depends on who is giving the speech, the little left wing college darlings throw pies and storm the stage when a "RIGHTIE" tries to talk, have the "NEO CONS" ever thrown pies when one of those
    "Dip Sh!t" Socialist Left Wing NUTS like Al Franken steps up to the Mike.
    :bricks:
     
  13. Pujo

    Pujo Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2005
    Messages:
    6,572
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    Lol, this story's just trying to stir up muck. Any youtube video can be flagged by users (and it's not a new policy like the article suggest). Youtube themselves don't flag videos.
     
  14. Real World

    Real World Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    27,150
    Likes Received:
    223
    Ratings:
    +537 / 6 / -2

    Or it could be about their biased toward your line of thinking, and therefore your lack of objectivity. Had the shoe been on the other foot, me thinks your position would be otherwise. Of course, that really can't be the case now can it?

    See, I'm opposed to biased & lean without having stated the obvious. For example, if you lean right, report so as long as you let it be known. Lean left, like wise. Where I have a problem is when sources restrict, or report, with a bias, but act as if they are neutral arbitrators of information.
     
  15. Harry Boy

    Harry Boy Look Up, It's Amazing PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    40,216
    Likes Received:
    196
    Ratings:
    +667 / 2 / -9

    Jon Stewart:
    Liberals LOVE him, the reason being, "HE IS ONE OF THEM"
    :rocker: "yup"
     

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>