- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,883
- Reaction score
- 66,866
There comes a time (like now) where the entertainment value of your obtuseness just becomes boring. I am SAYING that there is no single point where the "winning" team's behavior became undecent to any reasonable person. It simply was.
Ummm..... as I said, multiple times, in multiple ways. You can't find a tipping point. It's really kind of the point. Again, what's that tipping point? I listed the 4 crushing defeats suffered by that team. which ones were below that tipping point and which were above it?
Also, back to the 100-0 game, how many points were scored by the second and third string players? What style of defense does that team usually play? Why should a team not shoot for something it's never accomplished before, whether it be scoring 100 points or shutting out an opponent? Would 90 points have been too many?
80?
70?
60?
50?
40?
30?
Considering that the opponent can't even score 10 points, isn't scoring 20 points running up the score? You're throwing out words like "reasonable" and undecent (not a word, by the way), but you can't even tell me what the boundaries of "reasonable" were.
Again--I appreciate the fact you acknowledged you feel that hardcore pornography should be allowed on broadcast TV, and there was absolutely nothing wrong with the "winning" team's behavior in the 100-0 game. Again, we have fundamental disagreements on these points.
Hey, look.... here's that red herring again!