I think the Pats original extension term of 3 years was the right call. There was no need to give him a 5-6 year deal (even if after year 3 its all tentative). He would have still put up decent numbers the next few years, but at the age of 31, the inevitable decline in production would begin to show itself.
I know what you're thinking - "Troy Brown". Well, considering Branch's attitude towards getting his due, I don't think Branch would take kindly to stepping down to a #2 or 3 spot on the depth chart (nor getting paid like one). And if there are concerns about his durability NOW, wait til he gets a few more years on his fragile self.
So I say good call Pats
I know what you're thinking - "Troy Brown". Well, considering Branch's attitude towards getting his due, I don't think Branch would take kindly to stepping down to a #2 or 3 spot on the depth chart (nor getting paid like one). And if there are concerns about his durability NOW, wait til he gets a few more years on his fragile self.
So I say good call Pats