SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I'm glad NY is getting it and i wish they would send it to Lambeau and Gillette. Put a dress on everyone who fears snow and cold, it's football.
Why should NO be allowed to host 10 SB? They havent earned the right. You should play for the championship in any type of weather. It's supposed to be warm and comfortable? That's crap. Man up and play a mans game.
The fairest thing to do would be to rotate the SB among all 32 teams, but of course, there are some cities that probably don't want it.
While I am sure Boston proper could handle a Super Bowl event, getting everyone out to Foxboro would require somebody to invest some major $$ to provide shuttle buses, an upgrade to the rickety commuter line train tracks, or some other transportation solution. I for one don't think the community could (or would want to, unless you are a big NFL fan) handle it as things stand.
I wish more SB's were hosted by Houston. Reliant Stadium is a great stadium with amazing natural light as well as a retractable roof to watch the space shuttle's being launched into space. Plus, we still have the historic Astrodome right next to Reliant that could serve greatly for the Superbowl week festivities. Not to mention, Downtown Houston is very well kept up with plenty of places to eat and shop, and you won't get shot! *cough* Detroit *cough*
But the field sucks.
Since 2009, as far as I know, 3 players have torn their ACL on that crappy turf.
I might be wrong, but I'm guessing that maybe you've never been to New Orleans.Why should NO be allowed to host 10 SB? They havent earned the right. You should play for the championship in any type of weather. It's supposed to be warm and comfortable? That's crap. Man up and play a mans game.
I respecfully disagree PatsDeb. I've been to Pats Place on several ocassions. They could do it. Is Indy or Detroit or NO really better set up then the best owner in all of sports has us set up? He'd make it happen, just like he made this season happen. I have all the faith in the world in him (along with the angel looking over his shoulder).
It should be in New Orleans every year. Perfect place for it in every way.
It should be in New Orleans every year. Perfect place for it in every way.
It's already not fair since cold-weather, non-dome teams don't have a chance to host it. Letting one city get all those Super Bowl dollars every year is even more unfair.
Personally, I think the Super Bowl should be on a 32 year rotation. Every city/state with a team gets to host a Super Bowl. If both Super Bowl teams aren't tough enough to handle the elements in say, Foxboro or Green Bay, they shouldn't be playing football. Same thing with the fans. If the SB is in a cold city, bundle up or don't go.
Agreed. I wish they just kept it to 4 places, Miami, Tampa, SD, and NO. I went to the SB's in Jax and Houston and those were terrible choices.
I thought San Diego was permanently out of contention due to the stadium?
The stadium is the first, second, and third most important consideration if it isn't gifted like Jax.
The Super Bowl should be played indoors. So New Orleans, Atlanta, Arizona, and Houston (retractable?) are good choices.
Detroit is depressing but the surrounding areas are nice and Ford Field sets the standard for stadiums.
Besides if Indy was that bad, they would have moved the Combine from there.