JJDChE
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2004
- Messages
- 2,488
- Reaction score
- 534
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Yes some of you noticed this was a bit of a free association thread, though it all comes back to the Patriots here, no? A bit of a chicken little reaction on my part? Yes.
Obviously, we have had some great comebacks. Last year against Miami. This year against the Bills.
But, recently, how many close games have we won in the last 5 minutes of the fourth quarter? Versus how many where people say "Well, we only lost by X points" and start adding up how many points we lost by in all our games?
That's the perennial arithmetic of the loser squad that can't hold their crap together. The 2007 Ravens, for instance.
Winners look at W-L, losers and their fans count points in losses, add up stats in losses, and quibble about details (see my Brady quote).
I don't want to be that. I want to say, Yes, we can close a game. I want teams to be scared of being down to us with 4 minutes to go. Not confident they can just lob a few up and take it back from us because our secondary is so inept. Not confident that they will get an easy 3 and out because of McDaniels' conservative play calling, or Brady's recent tendency to see ghosts in high pressure situations.
Do I wish we had Manning (either one) at the helm? No. Do I want us to get our s*it together with these problems that have been haunting us for years now? YES.
Dude, you must not of watched the game. Yes, the whole Bronocos team played hard but come on, Manning marched them right down the field and stuck the dagger in. His pocket presence and accuracy was amazing. I hate to say it, but he really should be considered as one of the greatest Qbs of all time. And yes, so should Brady.
You know that the orignal poster wasn't insinuating that he wants Brady and the Pats to start off in a 24-0 hole. You even mentioned that you understood that we have a issue closing games out than typed this out.
He just mentioned the fact that this team cannot close games as of late. While the Patriots usually play with the lead for most of the game, if not all, we haven't been closing games and its been on the offense just as much as the defense. Sunday, it was the offense that failed to close the game. Defense forced Seattle into a 3-and-out and the Patriots crapped the bed.
Its not how you start, its how you finish. In all honesty, I'd take the way the Broncos game went over the way the Patriots game went anyday.
You realize dont you that Manning only netted 14 points for his team . .. had a pick six and three TDs drives all game long . ..
One TD drive was from the denver 20ish, so kudos there, but the other two drives were from midfield after two defensive ints . . .
So Manning contribution to the team is one long TD drive and two from midfield and a pick six . . . so tell me mosi, how impressive, in this day in age of the passing game, is a net score of 14 points and one long and 2 short TD drives? Best of all time impressive? or just your run of the mill average QBing in today NFL . . .
Nothing like marginalizing an exceptional, historic MNF performance from a QB.
Manning was incredible last night. Yes, it was a team effort - but anyone who enjoys the game of football, and watched the game, would hardly characterize what he did as "run of the mill/average." He was in a zone.
He wasn't average by any means, but if you take those Rivers picks out of the equation, the Broncos would have walked off with a loss.
The bottom line is: Denver didn't win last night. The Chargers lost.
That's a game you can play with any team, in almost any game. What happens if you take the 1st half fumbles & pick 6 off of the board?
Denver took that game in the 2nd half. They set the tone w/ the 1st drive, and had the Chargers on their heels the whole time. It's a disservice to the effort that whole team made to just put it on the Chargers throwing it away.
When the opposing QB tosses out 4 INTs, you can usually stop looking for reasons why a team won.
This case is not an exception to that.
In '04 - did Philly lose the Superbowl, or did NE win it?
Nothing like marginalizing an exceptional, historic MNF performance from a QB.
Manning was incredible last night. Yes, it was a team effort - but anyone who enjoys the game of football, and watched the game, would hardly characterize what he did as "run of the mill/average." He was in a zone.
In '04 - did Philly lose the Superbowl, or did NE win it?
Ha the OP agrees with you, he gave you a like.Your thread title is misleading. This isn't about Manning. It's another opportunity to complain about the Pats.
Rivers 4 INTs, 2 fumbles(1 for a TD) and a blocked punt for a TD. That was a 2nd half collapse of epic proportions. 5 of the 6 Rivers turnovers came in the second half along with the blocked punt, while Manning only had 1 or 2 incompletions out of 12-14 passes and 3 TDs.
The meltdown was just as impressive than the comeback, great game.
That team went 11/5, 10/6, 10/6 the three previous years before Montana arrived with DeBerg and then Craig at QB.
He was a great QB but under the Walsh system Steve Young was a great QB. Montana was great is worthy of mention as one of the greatest of all time but he also played on great teams with great overall talent under one of the Greatest if not the greatest offensive HC in NFL history.
There is no slam dunks in naming the greatest in this catagory.
There is an interesting thread on JI about which QB is better . I found this particular post interesting
Ha the OP agrees with you, he gave you a like.