Welcome to PatsFans.com

Wilfork refutes report of admission of being dirty player

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Peekaboo, Nov 7, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Peekaboo

    Peekaboo Rookie

    Joined:
    May 12, 2008
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    I’ve officially heard it all from Vince Wilfork. Wilfork issued a statement refuting that report.

    It read in part as follows.

    “After a very productive and fulfilling meeting with the NFL commissioner, it was inaccurately reported by ESPN that I stated that the hit on Buffalo Bills quarterback J.P. Losman last season was a cheap shot. I did not say that. I am not that type of player and would never intentionally try [to injure] a fellow NFL colleague.”

    My response is actions speak louder than words and apparently the NFL agrees in light of the most recent fine he received.

    Everyone is aware of they eye gouge attempt on Brandon Jacobs (fine), the late hit behind the play on Jason Witten (got a fine), the Losman hit (fine), the Cutler “love tap” with his elbow (fine), the dangerous facemask yank on Michael Turner (fine). But he’s been doing this since his rookie year.

    No one remembers him kicking Bills guard Chris Villarrial in the back when he was down on the ground following a Bills field goal attempt in 2003. No one remembers him cold ****ing Jonas Jennings with a helmet to helmet hit from behind, while Jennings was engaged with another defensive lineman on a pass play that left the offensive tackle knocked out cold with a concussion.

    A leopard doesn’t change his spots and Wilfork has proven that throughout his NFL career. It’s time to sit him down before he puts someone out of the game for good.
  2. JSn

    JSn Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2008
    Messages:
    7,449
    Likes Received:
    32
    Ratings:
    +32 / 0 / -0

    Sure thing. Right after the Bills game. ;)
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2008
  3. emoney_33

    emoney_33 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,194
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    leave you hater, leave. Go tell Vince how you feel about him to his face :D
  4. primetime

    primetime Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2005
    Messages:
    4,853
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 2 / -4

    At the risk of being lynched by my fellow Patriots fans, Wilfork is indeed a dirty player. There's just too much evidence that he intentionally attempts dirty plays. Perhaps he has a problem with his temper, but that's just speculation.
  5. Peekaboo

    Peekaboo Rookie

    Joined:
    May 12, 2008
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    The truth hurts doesn't it money.
  6. emoney_33

    emoney_33 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,194
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0


    Pushing, swinging, pointing at faces are not really dirty. Uncalled for maybe but not dirty. He's a friggin NT in the NFL, he's gotta be angry with all the shots he's taking throughout a game. It's not like he is hitting guys to hurt them, he just lets his emotions get the best of him from time to time. He doesn't really go that far overboard though.
  7. Mogamedogz

    Mogamedogz Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    Messages:
    3,028
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    WilFORK U pal.. Cry us a river. [​IMG]
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2008
  8. emoney_33

    emoney_33 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,194
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0


    You haven't spoken an ounce of truth on this board.
  9. Bobs My Uncle

    Bobs My Uncle PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2005
    Messages:
    2,273
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    If Wilfork played back in the day his play would be considered typical. The only reason he's considered dirty is because the league has made today's players a bunch of wusses.
  10. Peekaboo

    Peekaboo Rookie

    Joined:
    May 12, 2008
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    The evidence listed above is an indictment that's he's a dirty player. Most of that stuff is caught on film. If it was a criminal charge, he doesn't have much of a case.
  11. Peekaboo

    Peekaboo Rookie

    Joined:
    May 12, 2008
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    You guys were crying fowl when Brady went down did you not? Saying what Pollard did was dirty? That's how we felt when he hit Losman last year. The only difference is WILFORK ADMITTED IT WAS A CHEAP SHOT!
  12. emoney_33

    emoney_33 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,194
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0


    You haven't listed any proof troll. You listed things he got fined for. Pointing at faces, borderline late hits, pushing and shoving... none of that is DIRTY. Lunging at Brady's legs is dirty, continuously horse-collaring is dirty.
  13. emoney_33

    emoney_33 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,194
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0


    No he didn't admit anything because it wasn't DIRTY. ESPN reported that and ESPN lies.

    Don't ever compare that to Pollard's hit on Brady again!
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2008
  14. oldskool138

    oldskool138 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2,719
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    [​IMG]
    • Like Like x 1
  15. Peekaboo

    Peekaboo Rookie

    Joined:
    May 12, 2008
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    So is throwing an elbow at a QB's knee (Losman). He admitted it.
  16. primetime

    primetime Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2005
    Messages:
    4,853
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 2 / -4

    Pollard's hit wasn't dirty, it just happened. Wilfork's may or may not have been dirty, but it certainly appeared more intentional than Pollard's.

    I'm not certain why this is such a big issue, though. Football is a tough guy's game. Whining about it on a message board isn't going to change anything. What you're doing here is called trolling and flamebaiting. You need to stop.
  17. Mogamedogz

    Mogamedogz Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    Messages:
    3,028
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    [​IMG]
  18. Peekaboo

    Peekaboo Rookie

    Joined:
    May 12, 2008
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    You sure about that?



    Patriots' DVD saved DT Wilfork from suspension by NFL

    By Chris Mortensen
    ESPN.com
    (Archive)

    Updated: November 4, 2008, 4:21 PM ET

    * Comment
    * Email
    * Print

    NFL commissioner Roger Goodell was poised to suspend New England Patriots defensive tackle Vince Wilfork due to his prior illegal hits over the past two seasons, but a DVD from the Patriots' video department helped save him from at least a forced week off this season, sources told ESPN.

    Vince Wilfork

    Wilfork

    Wilfork's wife, Bianca, who joined Wilfork for the meeting, handed Goodell the DVD with a different camera angle that showed the alleged unnecessary roughness on Broncos quarterback Jay Cutler on a play in the Oct. 20 meeting between the Broncos and Patriots may not have been so rough. In the video, Cutler could be seen picking himself up and patting Wilfork on the helmet after the play.

    Wilfork did accept blame on his controversial hit against Buffalo Bills quarterback J.P. Losman last season that injured Losman's knee. Upon review of the play during his meeting with the commissioner, Wilfork admitted he didn't realize the ball had left Losman's hand as early as it did but said he had no intent to make a late hit, sources said. That play drew a $12,500 fine.

    The NFL did not have indisputable visual evidence that Wilfork hit Cutler in the head, as it first believed, but still determined that it was unnecessary roughness. Instead of a suspension, Wilfork was docked with a $35,000 fine.

    Vince and Bianca Wilfork wrote a thank you letter to Goodell at the end of the week. They also copied Ray Anderson, senior vice president of football operations, and Gene Washington, director of football operations, who were instrumental in the disciplinary action.

    Chris Mortensen is a senior NFL analyst for ESPN
  19. emoney_33

    emoney_33 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,194
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    Honestly, if you are going to flat out lie, just leave this site. He didn't admit to being dirty nor did he admit to throwing his elbow at the knee. Watch the damn replay, not zoomed in and not in slow mo. He was tackled from behind, threw his elbow up (towards Losman's hips) and while coming DOWN it hit the knee. He started to throw his elbow towards Losmans WAIST NOT HIS KNEE.



    I disagree 100% on Pollard's hit "just happening". As you can see from the link in my sig, he cut Morris' knees and then lunged for Brady. 100% dirty.



    He admitted he didn't realize the ball left Losman's hand so early, which is understandable while being tackled from the back!
  20. DaBruinz

    DaBruinz Pats, B's, Sox PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    23,735
    Likes Received:
    47
    Ratings:
    +54 / 0 / -1

    #50 Jersey


    Lets get a few things straight.
    1) You are a Bills fan.
    2) Instead of blaming Wilfork for the hit on Losman, how about you go back and review the play? If you did so, unbiasedly, you'd know that Brad Butlerr actually BLOCKED Wilfork into Losman. That's why the "fine" was reduced.
    3) There was no "eye gouge attempt" on Jacobs. Wilfork pointed his finger at Jacobs just as Jacobs more towards Wilfork. Jacobs even said that he didn't feel that Wilfork was attempting to hurt him.
    4) The facemask on Turner happened while Wilfork was engaged with an offensive lineman. It wasn't intentional regardless of what the idiot refs said.


    You also might want to do some homework. Nearly every "intentional" face mask penalty that was handed out last year resulted in a fine. Because Goodell is fine happy.
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2008
  21. DaBruinz

    DaBruinz Pats, B's, Sox PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    23,735
    Likes Received:
    47
    Ratings:
    +54 / 0 / -1

    #50 Jersey

    Except you didn't actually tell the truth.
  22. DaBruinz

    DaBruinz Pats, B's, Sox PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    23,735
    Likes Received:
    47
    Ratings:
    +54 / 0 / -1

    #50 Jersey

    WRONG.

    You might want to get your facts straight for a change. But that's probably asking too much
  23. DaBruinz

    DaBruinz Pats, B's, Sox PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    23,735
    Likes Received:
    47
    Ratings:
    +54 / 0 / -1

    #50 Jersey


    Wilfork did NOT admit anything. He was cheapshotted on the play by Brad Butler. Get your facts straight.

    Just because you're an idiot and don't actually watch the games doesn't mean that we are the same as you.
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2008
  24. LeonPowe

    LeonPowe Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2008
    Messages:
    356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    ???

    [​IMG]
  25. Peekaboo

    Peekaboo Rookie

    Joined:
    May 12, 2008
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    I'm the idiot? I'm not the one who is so blinded by homerism that I can't admit when my favorite teams players are dirty. It is well documented how many fines have been given to Wilfork and yet you fail to see what a danger he presents to the integrity of the game and players on opposing teams. If Trent Edwards get injured at the hands of this clown, mark my words, he will not play another down this season.
  26. emoney_33

    emoney_33 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,194
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0


    Ok now you are just a moron. A fine does not indicate a player is playing "dangerously". You are blinded by your patriots hatred.
  27. AndyJohnson

    AndyJohnson PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    21,857
    Likes Received:
    16
    Ratings:
    +26 / 0 / -1

    THAT is what you consider an admission of guilt?
    The fact that the ball was released earlier than he thought is an ADMISSION that he didnt see it released. He also ADMITTED he had no intent to make a late hit.

    There you go, Vince Wilfork has plead guilty to the crime of not seeing the ball relesed by the QB on that play.WOW
  28. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    40,775
    Likes Received:
    67
    Ratings:
    +92 / 3 / -1

    Disable Jersey

    Look, I know you like to troll, but at least be factually accurate when you do so. Otherwise, you will end up getting :banned:
  29. Peekaboo

    Peekaboo Rookie

    Joined:
    May 12, 2008
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Are you kidding me?! My god, you are such a homer.

    Everyone is aware of they eye gouge attempt on Brandon Jacobs (fine), the late hit behind the play on Jason Witten (got a fine), the Losman hit (fine), the Cutler “love tap” with his elbow (fine), the dangerous facemask yank on Michael Turner (fine). But he’s been doing this since his rookie year.

    What part of the word FINE do you not understand? If a player is fined, it's for unnesessary roughness. Anything "unnesessary" is considered dangerous.
  30. Peekaboo

    Peekaboo Rookie

    Joined:
    May 12, 2008
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    The fines he received are well documented fact. Anything else?
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page