TheGodInAGreyHoodie
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2007
- Messages
- 6,621
- Reaction score
- 1
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.You do know how to use smilies, don't you?We could have used him at RB, with the injuries we had.
Why doesn't our offensive unit consist of just 11 quarterbacks? The defense would never know who we'd hike the ball to, and they could just lateral to eachother until one gets open and then make a deep pass every play!
You do know how to use smilies, don't you?
Why doesn't our offensive unit consist of just 11 quarterbacks? The defense would never know who we'd hike the ball to, and they could just lateral to eachother until one gets open and then make a deep pass every play!
Matt is what, 6' 4", and while he's not as slow as Brady, nowadays, you want low to the ground guys that are fast and strong as your running backs. Matt isn't either of those.I should have stuck one in there. It wasn't a serious question, just a complement of his running ability. He could be a decent RB though. Obviously the reason why not is you can't risk an injury to back up qb like that.
Reminds me of an old video game called "10 yard fight".
We could have used him at RB, with the injuries we had.