If Branch wants to be traded to a team willing to pay him, on average, 6 million+ per season and... if that is pretty much the yearly rate he would get if franchised and... if compensation for a franchised player = two #1's, then... even though it almost never happens that a team GETS two #1's - isn't that, by definition, FAIR compensation? I mean, that's how the parameters are set up. THOSE are the rules. It's impossible to argue otherwise. No?