Welcome to PatsFans.com

Why did we attack Iraq Again?

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by mikey, Mar 5, 2006.

  1. mikey

    mikey Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,422
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    After $500 Billion, 2,300 dead American soldiers, 50,000 dead Iraq children and civilians, I keep forgetting why we attacked Iraq.

    Is it the WMD? -- Oops

    Is is Iraq's link to terrorism? -- then why is Saddam not being tried in the US for the death of 3,000 Americans

    Is it to fight terrorism? then what is Osama doing in Pakistan?

    Is it to deter future terrorism? then what is the axis-of-evils Iran and North Korea doing building more nuclear bombs?


    So tell me again: What did those 2,300 American soldiers die for?


    .
    Last edited: Mar 5, 2006
  2. All_Around_Brown

    All_Around_Brown Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2005
    Messages:
    3,098
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    follow the money
  3. mikey

    mikey Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,422
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0


    You mean those 2,300 American GI died for money?



    .
  4. All_Around_Brown

    All_Around_Brown Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2005
    Messages:
    3,098
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Freedoms on the march
  5. FreeTedWilliams

    FreeTedWilliams pfadmins PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    5,482
    Likes Received:
    97
    Ratings:
    +276 / 38 / -4

    #75 Jersey

    What about the reports that the WMD were moved prior to the invasion? With the very help of the countries that attempted to stop the invasion? What happens then? What they are found in Syria or Iran, and they are found to be made in France and or Russia? Seriously do you think that every intelligence service in the world got this wrong? Sadly I believe will we find out the hard way that they were moved, and on that day the Democrats will be lauding how they stopped the war and will be complaining about global warming.
  6. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    18,075
    Likes Received:
    190
    Ratings:
    +265 / 10 / -11

    So, you think we invaded Iraq, but failed to secure the WMDs? So, from that standpoint, the war is already a failure. Also, with all the restrictions that were on Saddam Hussein, I'd rather Iraq have the WMDs than Syria or Iran. According to you, all our war accomplished was to put the weapons even further out of reach.
  7. mikey

    mikey Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,422
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    If Weapons of Mass Destruction were MOVED, we would have found out.

    AMERICA is the MOST TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED nation on earth.

    We had SATELLITE surveillance all over Iraq.

    Colin Powell even had a satellite photo of a small TRUCK that was suppossed to be a portable lab.

    If ANYTHING was MOVED, we would have known.

    The REALITY IS THIS: THERE-IS-NO-WEAPON-OF-MASS-DESTRUCTION.

    As to intelligence report, DUBAI BUSH was CHERRY PICKIN' which intelligence reports to use.

    Do we have to go over this again???

    .
    Last edited: Mar 5, 2006

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>