Welcome to PatsFans.com

Who will the inactives be???

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Pats726, Oct 3, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Pats726

    Pats726 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    9,800
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    RB Green-Ellis, OL Ohrenberger,OL Simmons,TE Mathews, LB Mayo, DL Wilfork or Sands or Brace, DB Wheatley, S Lockett
    I am assuming Welker will play, Mayo will not...the two lineman are pretty easy and unless maroney does not play, Green-Ellis will remain inactive. Mathews was needed last week with more of a running game; not this week. If Wilfork plays, then Sands will not, unless they think he will be a better fit. One will be inactive. Wheatley played as Wilhite was out and Lockett will be the one that sits...unless they think he will be better than Slater. If Welker is out..one of the above will be added to the 45.
  2. JSn

    JSn Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2008
    Messages:
    7,449
    Likes Received:
    32
    Ratings:
    +32 / 0 / -0

    I'm gonna say Matthews and Wilfork play. If Sands gets the nod over Brace... ugh.
  3. farn

    farn Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2009
    Messages:
    1,715
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    Brace will be "active", then... not play. There's a guy people seemed excited about. He may yet pan out, but Wilfork - though not starting - did play early on in his rookie year before becoming the starter once the veterean NT left for more cash.

    I suspect inactives will include : Wilfork, Mayo, Sands, BJGE, Lockett, Orhnberger... maybe two of Slater-Matthews-Welker-Simmons ? Who knows... the Pats' 45 is one of the great weekly mysteries of the world !
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2009
  4. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    16,428
    Likes Received:
    40
    Ratings:
    +122 / 4 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    I'd love to see Simmons active tomorrow. We need some depth on the OL to try to take the fight to Ngata and Gregg and wear them down a little. Otherwise, we're not going to run the ball with any effectiveness.
  5. Pats726

    Pats726 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    9,800
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    Who will be inactive if Mathews plays?? I sense they are going to throw the ball more than run..so that is why I think they will keep him inactive. Brace was active and did not play...I see no problem with Sands over Brace..if he will add that much more. Brace is young and it's not a big deal that he's slow in getting it all. Pryor surprised many jumping over Brace.
  6. NYCPatsFan

    NYCPatsFan Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,405
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    No Jersey Selected

    I think I just saw a ticker on ESPN that Wilfork and Welker are inactives. Too bad that my girl changed the channel before I could rewind it.
  7. Pats726

    Pats726 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    9,800
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    Just curious as why WIlfork and Sands will be inactive..two...that leaves only 5 active linemen...with Brace a DNP from last week. If Lockett is out Slater will be in..for sure. Hoping that Welker is playing...
  8. Pats726

    Pats726 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    9,800
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    Unless there is a special announcement, the inactives will not come out till 2 or so hours from now. Maybe it's more of a guess...I hope it's not true as that is a bad scenario.
  9. Patjew

    Patjew PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2005
    Messages:
    9,575
    Likes Received:
    30
    Ratings:
    +54 / 0 / -0

    No Jersey Selected

    Someone please confirm this so I can get depressed ASAP.
  10. BradyManny

    BradyManny Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    9,708
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +47 / 0 / -0

    Don't get depressed yet - all the ticker said was that those two were Questionable - the inactives have not been listed yet.
  11. Pats726

    Pats726 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    9,800
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    Just saw BOTH the ESPN and NFLN tickers...and BOTH just stated the obvious Questionable..Kaczur, Wilfork, Welker.... NOT OUT.
  12. ctpatsfan77

    ctpatsfan77 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,431
    Likes Received:
    114
    Ratings:
    +205 / 4 / -5

    I wonder when they'll get to things like this:

    CLE: Questionable: Mangini (decisions) :p
  13. JSn

    JSn Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2008
    Messages:
    7,449
    Likes Received:
    32
    Ratings:
    +32 / 0 / -0

    Let me asplain...

    I think we'll see 3 TE's activated and I don't think that's bad for the game-day roster. Mattttthews (how many T's?) is a solid blocker and I'm sure he could catch a pass in a pinch. If we happen to find a weakness in their D for running, we're going to want a blocker of his calibre in there.

    Baker can catch and we've seen Watson become a game-changer once this season already, and his blocking has come a long way.

    I think the guy who doesn't play, assuming Welker does, is an RB.


  14. Pats726

    Pats726 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    9,800
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    I had both Mathews AND Green-Ellis as inactive..that was with Welker playing...not sure who you would have inactive with Mathews playing. If it be Welker or Green-Ellis...2 OLs then..there would be 5 inactive on D..and I think that would be a bit thin.
    I just do not see them having a game plan featuring the run as the Ravens D is incredibly strong against the run. I see this game as more winning in the air. If it was like last week where there was hope of a strong running game..and it was the best for teh Pats this year, Mathews would help and he was active. Just don't see it this week...but what do I know. It will be interesting to see who the Pats have active.
  15. JR4

    JR4 In the Starting Line-up PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,768
    Likes Received:
    14
    Ratings:
    +22 / 0 / -2

    Slater, Wilhite, Ohrnberger, Law Firm, Mathews, Simmons,
    Alexander(OR)Mayo, Sands


    edit: forgot about Sands
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2009
  16. Patspsycho

    Patspsycho Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    9,930
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    My guess is:

    Green-Ellis, Wilfork, Mayo, Simmons, Ohrenburger, Lockett, Wheatley, Sands.

    I don't think Sands will be active for this game (Brace is ahead of him). Pryor starts in place of Wilfork.
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2009
  17. JR4

    JR4 In the Starting Line-up PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,768
    Likes Received:
    14
    Ratings:
    +22 / 0 / -2

    This is a very important game. Could determine TOP seed in AFC.
    If VW is even 80% I can't see them not activating him even if he doesn't
    start.
  18. JSn

    JSn Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2008
    Messages:
    7,449
    Likes Received:
    32
    Ratings:
    +32 / 0 / -0

    I guess maybe Galloway is the player who let's me have my 3 TE's...
  19. Patspsycho

    Patspsycho Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    9,930
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    It's still not a division game.
  20. swheeler23

    swheeler23 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2007
    Messages:
    2,066
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Galloway=out
    Welker =in
    I know they do not play the same position.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>