Welcome to PatsFans.com

Who do you want as the #2 receiver in 2008?

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by PATRIOTSFANINPA, Feb 27, 2008.

?

Gaffney,Jackson or ??? - Who do you want at #2 receiver?

Poll closed Mar 3, 2008.
  1. Chad Jackson

    36.6%
  2. Jabar Gaffney

    33.8%
  3. Rookie WR (assuming the team drafts one)

    2.8%
  4. Too early to pick from the selections

    26.8%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. PATRIOTSFANINPA

    PATRIOTSFANINPA Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    15,726
    Likes Received:
    20
    Ratings:
    +31 / 0 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    Assuming Moss signs and Welker remains #3 WR and Donte is gone it appears unless a drafted rookie WR shows something special it will be down to Gaffney and Jackson for the #2 spot alongside Moss

    Who do you prefer as #2 and obviously the other WR at #4 depth?
     
  2. BradyManny

    BradyManny Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    10,040
    Likes Received:
    96
    Ratings:
    +334 / 5 / -1

    Chad Jackson with Jabar Gaffney as insurance.
     
  3. Tommysgirl

    Tommysgirl Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Messages:
    947
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    I have the exact opposite opinion. Jabar is proven, Chad is not.
     
  4. BradyManny

    BradyManny Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    10,040
    Likes Received:
    96
    Ratings:
    +334 / 5 / -1

    That's exactly why Gaffney is the insurance, IMO. He's proven, but Chad Jackson's potential upside dwarfs what Gaffney can give you. Until we see it on the field, having Gaffney on the roster is necessary.

    That's why Gaffney/Jackson is a great combination to have...reliability & awesome potential, respectively.
     
    Last edited: Feb 27, 2008
  5. Rob0729

    Rob0729 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Messages:
    33,571
    Likes Received:
    1,475
    Ratings:
    +4,239 / 46 / -16

    I am hoping Chad Jackson, but only because he is worthy of being our #2 WR. I don't want him to be our #2 WR just because no one is better. Besides, Welker is our #2 WR as far as I am concerned.
     
  6. Tunescribe

    Tunescribe PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    Messages:
    17,356
    Likes Received:
    699
    Ratings:
    +2,407 / 15 / -23

    #61 Jersey

    Chad Jackson just better grow up and step up this year, that's all I can say.
     
  7. tombonneau

    tombonneau In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    May 27, 2005
    Messages:
    3,215
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +17 / 3 / -0

    Odd that a guy with 110+ receptions in 2007 not be considered the team's #2WR in 2008, but I'll play along ... ;)

    I said Chad Jackson, simply because that would mean in the coaches' eyes he has developed into an NFL starting WR.

    Gaffney I'd be fine with, but to what you'd prefer, not sure how everyone wouldn't prefer to see CJax develop into the #2.

    Also, I think Stallworth should be part of this poll, as that is who I would actually want.
     
  8. BradyToMoss

    BradyToMoss Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Chad Jackson, Moss and Welker with Gaffney as the #3 or rotation #2 with Chad will be unstoppable. Assuming Gaffney signs and "hoping" Randy signs, I can see BB using a Jackson/Gaffney rotation until 1 takes it away from the other.

    Chad will be given every opportunity to show us his stuff and i'm hoping he can take advantage of it and grab the #2 next to Randy.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 27, 2008
  9. dhamz

    dhamz In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2004
    Messages:
    3,152
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    I see no reason at all to go into the season counting on a guy who caught 0 passes last year as a starter or in any major role for that matter.
     
    Last edited: Feb 27, 2008
  10. PATRIOTSFANINPA

    PATRIOTSFANINPA Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    15,726
    Likes Received:
    20
    Ratings:
    +31 / 0 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    Stallworth is not on the poll because I give him a 5% chance of returning to New England with the only real way being no one pays him enough to satisfy his financial expectations and can't outbid New England which IMO this team really does not think he is crucial to this offense anyway since he was a near no show many games of 2007 with Welker far outshining him.

    Stallworth's contributions to the 2007 Patriots was good but not up to expectations as a #2 receiver would earn.
     
  11. Sean Pa Patriot

    Sean Pa Patriot Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,231
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    I would love Stallworth, but that is not a option..:mad:
     
  12. upstater1

    upstater1 Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    13,175
    Likes Received:
    67
    Ratings:
    +194 / 14 / -3

    My choice is: Someone else.

    But that's not an option.
     
  13. JackBauer

    JackBauer Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Messages:
    16,483
    Likes Received:
    385
    Ratings:
    +915 / 6 / -9

    Jackson, by a long shot.
     
  14. JoePats

    JoePats In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    2,145
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Well, #3 receiver sounds awfully negative, implying that he is not better than the #2, which I guess sometimes is true, but certianly not in the Pats case.

    With Moss and Welker, and taking the cap and other team needs into consideration, as well as Stallworth's role as the season wore on, a Gaffney/Jackson platoon should be just fine.
     
  15. dhamz

    dhamz In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2004
    Messages:
    3,152
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Has there ever been a player who produced so little been as popular with fans as Chad Jackson?
     
  16. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    44,539
    Likes Received:
    1,091
    Ratings:
    +4,050 / 193 / -145

    Disable Jersey

    Chad's popularity, or lack thereof, is a pretty direct result of two lost seasons. If he comes back strong this year, the love will follow.
     
  17. tombonneau

    tombonneau In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    May 27, 2005
    Messages:
    3,215
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +17 / 3 / -0

    I'm not a member of the fan club, nor do I hate the guy; however, when given the choice of who I want to see emerge as the Pats #2 WR, why would I not be pulling for a physically-gifted former 2nd round pick going into his third year?
     
  18. JackBauer

    JackBauer Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Messages:
    16,483
    Likes Received:
    385
    Ratings:
    +915 / 6 / -9

    Probably because people root for him because they realize the kind of potential he has?
     
  19. Joker

    Joker PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2004
    Messages:
    18,317
    Likes Received:
    1,152
    Ratings:
    +3,603 / 27 / -35

    I have yet to see Chad Jackson accelerate in a game like his forty time suggests he should...he has bad hands, lousy footwork, runs terrible routes and is injury prone in his early 20's....yeah, let's all bang the Chad Jackson drum
     
  20. JackBauer

    JackBauer Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Messages:
    16,483
    Likes Received:
    385
    Ratings:
    +915 / 6 / -9

    Jackson has bad hands? Really? Is that why he won the hands contest at the combine? Because he has bad hands?

    I wouldn't call him injury prone, either. Couple of freak injuries does not an injury-prone player make.

    As for the lousy footwork and terrible routes... what basis do you have to believe this is the case?
     
    Last edited: Feb 27, 2008
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>