Which one would you chose?

[MetalBleachers]

Any given Sunday. The VIkes went 15-1 and didn't even make it to the superbowl, let alone win.

Didn't the Steelers go 15-1 in 2004? BIG disappointment, losing the AFCCG to a team they crushed in the regular season.

 

[fgssand]

Look, I am all about winning Superbowls and ultimately - that is my choice.

However, to get Shula and that damn smug group of crotchedy old Dolphins, that beat a bunch of very ordinary teams on their way to their undeafeted season, out of the limelight would really be awesome.

 

[rabthepat]

Superbowl, 16-0 without a SB would be a curse.

 

[godef]

If Pats can have only one of these two; which one would you chose and why?

16-0

OR

Superbowl.

I can't make up my mind. To me Pats will always be the team of this decade. We are already a dynastic team. We already acheived many things, multiple SB, longest WIN streaks, post season streaks etc etc. But going 16-0 - even without a SB this season - will give Pats another level of immortality.
Don't you think?

I disagree. 16-0 without a Super Bowl wouldn't cut it for me. It would still be an impeefect season... and if you're going to be imperfect, you may as well allow the imperfection to occur during the regular season.

 

[godef]

If we went 16-0 and didn't win the SB, it wouldn't really add to our dynasty, we would be know as the team who couldn't finish.

Brady loosing the superbowl, are you crazy?

Could be an AFC play-off loss for Brady. That's happened...

 

[LaBrady]

Since everyone chose the SB I am gonna go with 16-0!!! :bricks:

 

[Kdo5]

SB. What a stupid question.

 

[smg93]

I'd be surprised if anyone said 16-0...

Why would anyone pass up on the ultimate goal every season?