I went with Gronkowski because of the almost impossible task of overtaking Mike Ditka's NFL record of 12TDs by a rookie Tight End last set in the year 1964
NOTE: ITS GRONKOWSKI IN THAT POLL,NOT GOSTKOWSKI!!! - Couldn't change it but always make that mistake :bricks:
I went with Gronkowski because of the almost impossible task of overtaking Mike Ditka's NFL record of 12TDs by a rookie Tight End last set in the year 1964
NOTE: ITS GRONKOWSKI IN THAT POLL,NOT GOSTKOWSKI!!! - Couldn't change it but always make that mistake :bricks:
So he can show a good performance just in case we ever need him barring any Brady injury or at least showcase his talents for the future
Hoyer wouldn't take over Brady's job for at least 5 or 6 years from now and by then he will surely be gone and probably starting elsewhere like Cassel,this will help his career down the line and will hopefully show Pats fans he is capable of carrying the team in a dire emergency.
It's funny, I was thinking "Why in God's name would anyone choose anything but Hoyer from this list?"
All of the others are nice but ultimately meaningless individual milestones. A long, highly successful stint by Hoyer means a more experienced backup quarterback -- one who has earned extra confidence from his teammates, and himself. How can you not choose the one option that actually makes the team better?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.