Extending this further across the entire draft:
We've learned that the Patriots are no better than the league, statistically, in identifying players in the draft.
Comparing performance across this decade for the league, with performance under Belichick, at gaining starters from each round:
FIRST - Pats 100%, NFL 75%
SECOND - Pats 38% , NFL 50%
THIRD - Pats 33%, NFL 30%
FOURTH - Pats 21%, NFL 25%
FIFTH - Pats 13%, NFL 20%
SIXTH - Pats 7%, NFL 9%
SEVENTH - Pats 13%, NFL 9%
Really, that's about league average.
The Pats are well below league average in the second round, and then track pretty closely. Maybe they tend to take bigger risks in the second, like on trading up for Chad Jackson or taking an OT like Vollmer that is considered a late rounder.
This would seem to be an average draft.
There are some nice values, like Butler in the second and the trades of the two thirds.
There are some fairly solid picks, like Chung in the second and McKenzie in the third, maybe a slight reach, but he could be a good fit at ILB.
There are some reaches, like Tate, with his injury and drug test issue, but great upside, Vollmer, a low-ranked tackle taken very early, and Ohrenberger in the fourth.