Welcome to PatsFans.com

What do think of this law?

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by PatriotsReign, Dec 7, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. PatriotsReign

    PatriotsReign Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Messages:
    25,620
    Likes Received:
    73
    Ratings:
    +149 / 1 / -9

    We have a law in this country that severely limits how much you can put into a 401K based upon your salary. This law states that if you make over $110K/yr, you can only contribute 2% more the average contribution level of your company.

    For example, if your company average is 4% and you make over $110K, then you can only contribute 6% annually.

    WTF!!! Is this supposed to "even the playing field" or what? Does our gov't feel sorry for those who only want to contribute 4%?

    Now keep in mind that if you made 50-$60K all your life and suddenly get a job that pays $112K, you immediately get your contributions cut. The law doesn't take into consideration how many children you may have, how much (or little) you have in your 401K or the cost of living in your area.

    A person making $106K can contribut about $17K/yr and the person making $112K is only allowed to contribute $6K/yr. What a joke our lawmakers are!

    http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=187833,00.html
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2009
  2. Mrs.PatsFanInVa

    Mrs.PatsFanInVa PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    15,227
    Likes Received:
    225
    Ratings:
    +315 / 7 / -3

    #12 Jersey

    I don't suppose you have a link to this law, do you?
  3. PatriotsReign

    PatriotsReign Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Messages:
    25,620
    Likes Received:
    73
    Ratings:
    +149 / 1 / -9

    Highly Compensated Employees (HCE)

    "To help ensure that companies extend their 401(k) plans to low-paid employees, an IRS rule limits the maximum deferral by the company's "highly compensated" employees, based on the average deferral by the company's non-highly compensated employees. If the rank and file saves more for retirement, then the executives are allowed to save more for retirement. This provision is enforced via "non-discrimination testing". Non-discrimination testing takes the deferral rates of "highly compensated employees" (HCEs) and compares them to non-highly compensated employees (NHCEs). An HCE in 2008 is defined as an employee with compensation of greater than $100,000 in 2007 or an employee that owned more than 5% of the business at any time during the year or the preceding year.[8] In addition to the $100,000 limit for determining HCEs, employers can elect to limit the top-paid group of employees to the top 20% of employees ranked by compensation.[8] That is for plans whose first day of the plan year is in calendar year 2007, we look to each employee's prior year gross compensation (also known as 'Medicare wages') and those who earned more than $100,000 are HCEs. Most testing done now in 2009 will be for the 2008 plan year and compare employees' 2007 plan year gross compensation to the $100,000 threshold for 2007 to determine who is HCE and who is a NHCE.

    The average deferral percentage (ADP) of all HCEs, as a group, can be no more than 2 percentage points greater (or 150% of, whichever is less) than the NHCEs, as a group. This is known as the ADP test. When a plan fails the ADP test, it essentially has two options to come into compliance. It can have a return of excess done to the HCEs to bring their ADP to a lower, passing, level. Or it can process a "qualified non-elective contribution" (QNEC) to some or all of the NHCEs to raise their ADP to a passing level. The return of excess requires the plan to send a taxable distribution to the HCEs (or reclassify regular contributions as catch-up contributions subject to the annual catch-up limit for those HCEs over 50) by March 15 of the year following the failed test. A QNEC must be an immediately vested contribution."


    401(k) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  4. mcgraw_wv

    mcgraw_wv Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Messages:
    2,257
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0

    Honestly it makes sense to me. And to be honest, I don't think we should allow for any tax free money for retirement. You should not have to be bribed into saving for your retirement.

    As well, there are plenty of studies that show 401k only benefits the Rich and not the middle class worker. 401k is a great benefit to those who's 4% is a lot of money, but more people's 4% is a small 2 - 3k a year.

    So the reality is the Higher paid employees everywhere get even more money from their employers via matching, and get even more money tucked away for retirement tax free.

    Why not remove the complexity, reduce the tax rate 1% and remove the tax free status of 401ks.

    Overall everyone is better off as we pay less tax, and their is no percentage based tax saving which dramatically favors those who make a lot more money.
  5. PatriotsReign

    PatriotsReign Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Messages:
    25,620
    Likes Received:
    73
    Ratings:
    +149 / 1 / -9

    Because of course we don't want to make people who make less feel bad, do we?:rolleyes:

    That's the whole incentive to make MORE! Because you can SAVE more! And making 401 contributions non-taxable incents everyone to save more for retirement.

    Making more isn't unfair to anyone....you do know and understand this, don't you?
  6. BelichickFan

    BelichickFan B.O. = Fugazi PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    31,328
    Likes Received:
    121
    Ratings:
    +249 / 7 / -9

    #24 Jersey

    401Ks themselves are a separate issue but I think this particular exception sucks (although it doesn't affect me). There is an IRS annual cap of $16.5K that you can contribute and that cap should suffice, regardless of the average of your workplace.
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2009
  7. Mrs.PatsFanInVa

    Mrs.PatsFanInVa PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    15,227
    Likes Received:
    225
    Ratings:
    +315 / 7 / -3

    #12 Jersey

    Unless of course you're hiding it and refusing to pay income taxes on it....in which case it's grossly unfair to everyone else who plays by the rules.
  8. efin98

    efin98 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2009
    Messages:
    5,090
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    You didn't answer his question.
  9. Mrs.PatsFanInVa

    Mrs.PatsFanInVa PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    15,227
    Likes Received:
    225
    Ratings:
    +315 / 7 / -3

    #12 Jersey

    It wasn't me he was asking.
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2009
  10. efin98

    efin98 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2009
    Messages:
    5,090
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Sorry for the mistake.
  11. PatriotsReign

    PatriotsReign Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Messages:
    25,620
    Likes Received:
    73
    Ratings:
    +149 / 1 / -9

    Yet, you STILL responded with an irrelevant comment...didn't you dear!;)

    So how is everything down in the Beltway? Heard it was pretty cold yesterday.
  12. alvinnf

    alvinnf Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2008
    Messages:
    3,298
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Motivating individuals to save more for their retirement makes allot of sense. The more you squirrel away, the less of a burden you become for society. Why they wouldn't want to encourage not discourage people from it is beyond me. Oh yeah, they like their hussled masses to be beholden to them. I forgot?
  13. Mrs.PatsFanInVa

    Mrs.PatsFanInVa PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    15,227
    Likes Received:
    225
    Ratings:
    +315 / 7 / -3

    #12 Jersey

    Wow, PR, talk about irrelevant comments.

    Oh and BTW, there are only a few people who know me well enough to call me "dear."

    You're not one of them.
  14. PatriotsReign

    PatriotsReign Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Messages:
    25,620
    Likes Received:
    73
    Ratings:
    +149 / 1 / -9

    ok, how's dearie? ;)

    It's called small talk. Every now & then it's ok to inquire about someone's well being. And of course, our well being is ALWAYS relevant. What could be more relevant MrsPFiVA?

    The Patriots sucked royally yesterday, don't you think? Too bad the Redskins didn't pull that one out against the "Who dat's"!!
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2009
  15. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    40,840
    Likes Received:
    90
    Ratings:
    +151 / 3 / -19

    Interesting respectful comments... :D:D:D

    Why don't you ask Harry about the Games yesterday???
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2009
  16. PatriotsReign

    PatriotsReign Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Messages:
    25,620
    Likes Received:
    73
    Ratings:
    +149 / 1 / -9

    If you can find anything disrespectful in my comments, I'd just love to see it!

    Keep in mind the purpose of the blinking guy...:cool:
  17. PatriotsReign

    PatriotsReign Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Messages:
    25,620
    Likes Received:
    73
    Ratings:
    +149 / 1 / -9

    And this would be my reply:

    #1. Harry does not have "PATSFAN" in his screen name but MrsPATSFANinVA certainly does. So I assume she's a Patriots fan, didnt you?

    #2. I commented upon the Redskins because she lives in the Washington DC area.

    I hope that answers your questions satisfactorily.....


    JEESH!
  18. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    40,840
    Likes Received:
    90
    Ratings:
    +151 / 3 / -19



    Yea, that is exactly what you meant...:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: no harm intended, no "ad hominen attacks\"... attacking the poster, while disregarding the content...
  19. PatriotsReign

    PatriotsReign Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Messages:
    25,620
    Likes Received:
    73
    Ratings:
    +149 / 1 / -9

    "If" you could tell me exactly what could be OFFENDING, then we could have a discussion Darryl.

    What did YOU think of the Patriots' play yesterday?

    Believe it or not, MrsPatsFaninVA and I have exchanged several civil PM's in the past....kinda like you & I have.
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2009
  20. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    40,840
    Likes Received:
    90
    Ratings:
    +151 / 3 / -19

    Calling a woman dearie, after she called you on it is not exactly a terms of endearment... it usually denotes a very condescending, sexist attitude. Say what you will, but it is atypical misogynous behavior..

    There is expected decorum and manners, even if you get pissed off...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>