skspikex2
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2007
- Messages
- 883
- Reaction score
- 876
SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
I don't argue with the mentaly handicaped its not fair. Its not very CLASSY .
Just curious have you ever ah,"cough" debated aqwaaaa before? If not logic won't work, hes allergic to logic. He lives in his own reality. So don't wast your time.You really suck at logic and you really need to take a class in it.
I'll give you a shot Mr. Logic. You're invoking the "fallacy" term because he invoked Porter's name. You invoked Chad Johnson's name to support your position. What does Johnson have to do with Welker if Porter doesn't count? Also, you invoked the "C" word. Have you ever heard of Argumentum ad populum?
Now, since you think that you're engaging in a logical debate, please tell me what the premises of the argument is? The only way that you can have a valid debate where you invoke a logical fallacy is by establishing a logical (valid) argument. I'd like to hear that premises. From what I can tell, the author of the thread gave an opinion which was not and could not be interpreted as deterministic statement so therefore does not have a basis in a logical debate. Please tell me how you invoke a logical fallacy from the above. I'd like to hear that and while you're at it, tell me where you learned it so that I can avoid sending my children to that school system.
In other words, stop using language to try and sound intelligent because you don't understand the subject matter. You only make yourself sound dumb. If I'm mistaken and you would like to get technical though, please do but please use precise language so that I know to use it too.
You really suck at logic and you really need to take a class in it.
I'll give you a shot Mr. Logic. You're invoking the "fallacy" term because he invoked Porter's name. You invoked Chad Johnson's name to support your position. What does Johnson have to do with Welker if Porter doesn't count? Also, you invoked the "C" word. Have you ever heard of Argumentum ad populum?
Now, since you think that you're engaging in a logical debate, please tell me what the premises of the argument is? The only way that you can have a valid debate where you invoke a logical fallacy is by establishing a logical (valid) argument. I'd like to hear that premises. From what I can tell, the author of the thread gave an opinion which was not and could not be interpreted as deterministic statement so therefore does not have a basis in a logical debate. Please tell me how you invoke a logical fallacy from the above. I'd like to hear that and while you're at it, tell me where you learned it so that I can avoid sending my children to that school system.
In other words, stop using language to try and sound intelligent because you don't understand the subject matter. You only make yourself sound dumb. If I'm mistaken and you would like to get technical though, please do but please use precise language so that I know to use it too.
lmao.your putting people on the ignore list ?lol lol you put me on your ignore list at least 15 times lmao.its funny i never seem to stay nor does anybody else lol.
