Welcome to PatsFans.com

Wes Welker - A Modern Day Steve Largent

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by PATRIOTSFANINPA, Mar 29, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. PATRIOTSFANINPA

    PATRIOTSFANINPA Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    15,719
    Likes Received:
    12
    Ratings:
    +12 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

  2. Zeke_Mowatt

    Zeke_Mowatt Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Messages:
    834
    Likes Received:
    5
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0 / -0

    Neat article but I tend to lose respect for "writers" who have trouble with simple facets of the English language. That might be the most poorly written sentence I've ever read... ;)
  3. Kdo5

    Kdo5 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2005
    Messages:
    6,264
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +13 / 5 / -1

    ^ haha thats so true. That first part of the sentence was terrible. I could have done better than that in the third grade.
  4. RayClay

    RayClay On the Roster

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    17,909
    Likes Received:
    168
    Ratings:
    +354 / 6 / -8

    #75 Jersey

    I'd rather have Welker.

    Largent caught a lot of balls but I never thought of him as one of the greats.
  5. upstater1

    upstater1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    13,027
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +43 / 4 / -3

    They aren't remotely close in terms of how they played.
  6. VJCPatriot

    VJCPatriot Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Messages:
    12,344
    Likes Received:
    28
    Ratings:
    +46 / 1 / -4

    Did Largent have a #1 receiver on the other side of the field that made his life that much easier? I think calling Welker the next Largent is a huge exaggeration at this point.
  7. mangenious

    mangenious Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    504
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    :eek:Wanna take the homer shades off for a sec?
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2008
  8. hammer

    hammer Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2008
    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    As a Colts fan, I hardly fit the 'homer' category. I'm also an old man who watched Largent play his whole career. Certainly, he hasn't yet played long enough to be placed along side of Largent but given good health and enough seasons, Welker may well go down as one of the all-time great slot-recievers.
    He scares the living hell out of me.
  9. ctpatsfan77

    ctpatsfan77 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,401
    Likes Received:
    110
    Ratings:
    +180 / 4 / -5

    As I've pointed out before, if you ask Moss, I think he'd be the first to point out that the "making life easier" thing works both ways--TD catch #23 happened because the Giants were determined not to let Welker get the first down.

    I'm glad to hear that. :D
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2008
  10. RayClay

    RayClay On the Roster

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    17,909
    Likes Received:
    168
    Ratings:
    +354 / 6 / -8

    #75 Jersey

    Welker fills a specific role and he's as good at that as anyone. We also have Randy Moss.

    I know some just compare statistics, but for the role we need filled, Wes is just fine.
  11. jeffbiologist

    jeffbiologist Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,433
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Man, I like Welker alot, and I really like the way we can use the "cross-rift" of him and Moss.....but to compare a guy with 1 good year created by 2 Hall of Famers(Moss/Brady)to a guy IN the HOF....come on,get real.
  12. upstater1

    upstater1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    13,027
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +43 / 4 / -3

    But why compare them? because they're white?

    Welker has much more in common with Troy Brown than he does Largent.
  13. mangenious

    mangenious Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    504
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    jeffbiologist officially on the great posters on patsfans.com list
  14. mangenious

    mangenious Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    504
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I wonder if draft analyst will ever compare Tim Tebow when he comes out to a Vick, McNabb or Culpepper. He is white so we might get a Fran Tarkenton comparison
  15. mangenious

    mangenious Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    504
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    yeah but comparing one year of great football (notice I give due where it is due to Welker) to a HOF WR is ridiculous
  16. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    16,370
    Likes Received:
    33
    Ratings:
    +96 / 2 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    Man, what's with the absurd Welker articles lately? This is almost as bad as the Herald's feature piece on how much he likes ice cream (seriously- the communications blackout with that rag has left their football 'reporting' hurting)
  17. unoriginal

    unoriginal Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2006
    Messages:
    3,209
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +41 / 2 / -1

    Sammy Morris: a modern day Earl Campbell.
  18. Funktopus

    Funktopus Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2007
    Messages:
    345
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    I'd start watching c-span if Welker follows Largent's career later in life. I'd love to hear him fillibuster on the floor of the house.
  19. RayClay

    RayClay On the Roster

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    17,909
    Likes Received:
    168
    Ratings:
    +354 / 6 / -8

    #75 Jersey

    I didn't make that comparison. I said I'd rather have Welker (I would, for what we need. Largent wasn't as spastically elusive as Welker, and that's what we need Wes for. Largent was a great possession receiver, but we don't really need that).

    I also said i didn't consider him an all time great when he played (I've been watching football since the early 60's.)

    He was a very good, disciplined, reliable possession receiver who was consistent over a long period. There were receivers during his era with less accumulation of statistics I considered great, that defense adjusted for, that made great plays.

    I'm making different points than the OP, not agreeing with him.
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2008
  20. Fencer

    Fencer Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2006
    Messages:
    7,635
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +15 / 0 / -1

    And every versatile white forward is the next Larry Bird. :)

    Was Largent primarily a slot receiver too? If so, the comparison is defensible. Otherwise, not so much.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>