Welcome to PatsFans.com

Welker Could Miss Week One

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Pats Fan in Indy, Sep 7, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Pats Fan in Indy

    Pats Fan in Indy Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

  2. ctpatsfan77

    ctpatsfan77 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,407
    Likes Received:
    111
    Ratings:
    +181 / 4 / -5

    That's because it was discussed to death several days ago.

    And wasn't Welker 1.0 seen at practice before the Giants game?
  3. PatsBoy12

    PatsBoy12 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    6,247
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +12 / 0 / -0

    Thanks for posting this because I definitely missed any other threads related to a Wes Welker absence in week 1.
  4. blackglass3

    blackglass3 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    4,782
    Likes Received:
    17
    Ratings:
    +20 / 0 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    Welker was standing on the sideline of the Giants game chit chatting with TFB. Both were in uniform.

    This was just one of the latest guessing games the media was playing last week.
  5. Rob0729

    Rob0729 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Messages:
    29,696
    Likes Received:
    201
    Ratings:
    +435 / 5 / -1

    Mike Reiss said on the radio yesterday that Welker was returning punts before the Giants game. Sounds like he is close to ready. My guess is that if that game was a real game, he would have practiced and play.
  6. Pats Fan in Indy

    Pats Fan in Indy Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    my bad, it is hard to follow every discussion on this forum. I'll try to pay better attention next time.
  7. wiggins!

    wiggins! Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    502
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Not releated to whether Welker plays or not but the reason he was in uniform - like everyone else - was that it was mandated by the NFL that for the LAST pre-season game, everyone on the roster MUST dress. It's an NFL thing for that one game. That's why he was dressed - even though he wasn't going to play.
  8. Pats726

    Pats726 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    9,800
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    Actually ALL Patriot players were in unis that last game...per Reiss
  9. Rob0729

    Rob0729 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Messages:
    29,696
    Likes Received:
    201
    Ratings:
    +435 / 5 / -1

    Is there a league rule that every player must participate in the pregame warm ups too? Because Welker did that too.
  10. wiggins!

    wiggins! Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    502
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Nope....Brady participated in those too. I wasn't questioning whether he plays in wk 1 or doesn't. I'm point out that do you/we really think Brady, Welker etc...those who didn't need to play, would even be in uniform for that game? Someone mentioned he was "dressed" for pre-season week 4. I was stating that the league rule this year is that everyone dresses for week 4. That's all.
  11. italia44

    italia44 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,287
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    jeez.....the guy is trying to post some relevant info about Welker,why can't people just lay-off and discuss the threads?
  12. PatsBoy12

    PatsBoy12 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    6,247
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +12 / 0 / -0

    That's what I was thinking, especially since I hadn't seen the other thread either. I actually thanked the OP for starting the thread.
  13. farn

    farn Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2009
    Messages:
    1,714
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    I hadn't seen anything before now either... but moving on : Welker missing week one would be a minor inconvenience. That Bills team with their "Pop Warner" offense should be trampled on with or without Wes.

    I'd be a lot more concerned if he has to miss more than the Monday Nighter, though Edelman should be able to step up in a temporary role. Fun to see how much action Edelman sees and what he does in real games. Not fun if we HAVE to see him because of injuries to Welker.
  14. italia44

    italia44 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,287
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    there's too much nit-picking and not enough thanking on this board,imho
  15. patsox23

    patsox23 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    7,387
    Likes Received:
    9
    Ratings:
    +9 / 1 / -0

    Don't worry about it. Stuff happens.

    I seriously doubt Welker misses week one. I'm sure it's B.S. speculation based on the fact that he's been out awhile.
  16. Patjew

    Patjew PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2005
    Messages:
    9,574
    Likes Received:
    28
    Ratings:
    +52 / 0 / -0

    No Jersey Selected

    Take it to the insult thread!
  17. italia44

    italia44 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,287
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    My post was an insult?
  18. Patjew

    Patjew PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2005
    Messages:
    9,574
    Likes Received:
    28
    Ratings:
    +52 / 0 / -0

    No Jersey Selected

    No, of course not. I was agreeing with you. I meant the nit-pickers shoul take it there. Sorry, still early here.
  19. ctpatsfan77

    ctpatsfan77 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,407
    Likes Received:
    111
    Ratings:
    +181 / 4 / -5

    My bad. :( :(

    That said, the original point remains: it wasn't there because it had been discussed to death several days before, and fallen several pages back in the cutdown/Seymour trade frenzy.
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2009
  20. patman12

    patman12 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    443
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -1

    Thank you, thank you, thank you.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>