pheenix11
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2006
- Messages
- 5,151
- Reaction score
- 4,777
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Yeah I understand that, and I know that kind of decision making as well as financial stuff will go into it, but I was just so impressed with him when he was involved tonight. It sucks realizing that we may be too overloaded with talent for a guy with his ability to even "want" to stay if he's not going to A.) be more involved, paid more (as he would) with increased involvement.Funny, I thought he played fantastic in limited plays and also thought, how can we afford a guy this talented that only gets two looks in a game where we hardly throw to Moss.
Of course we sign him if the price is right, but Gaff or some other options might have to do.
If you were Stallworth, do you sign for less money to get two or three looks a game?
Known it all year, but after his performance tonight it cements it into my head, yes we need to do our best to maintain Moss too, but we need a guy like Stallworth. His 53yd clutch catch tonight, extending his body for the first down with 2 mins in the game, he's so athletic and talented that we'd seriously be making a mistake letting him walk. What do you think? maybe im just stoked on the game and all, but man he came through for us guys.
Hey, if yall (yea I know, I'm from the south, so sue me) don't want him, send him down here. We'd be happy to take him off of you!
would love to keep him but assuming we resign moss, it would be too much cap room invested in 1 position.
he is a luxury, not a need imo
Because he was looking at the Jumbotron!