Welcome to PatsFans.com

We Need an Atheist on the Supreme Court???

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by IcyPatriot, May 4, 2010.

  1. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    39,681
    Likes Received:
    558
    Ratings:
    +1,350 / 34 / -28

    #87 Jersey

    I saw it ... I clicked it ... and i agree with Marc Cooper.

    So I'll post it ... I'm a Catholic ... but the Supreme Court is supposed to be for everybody.

    To replace John Paul Stevens, an atheist - latimes.com

     
    Last edited: May 4, 2010
  2. apple strudel

    apple strudel Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,894
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0

    Re: We Need an Athiest on the Supreme Court???

    Hell yes. But a satanist who'd eat Scalia's or Alito's liver would be even better.
     
  3. chicowalker

    chicowalker Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    13,236
    Likes Received:
    139
    Ratings:
    +296 / 3 / -4

    Re: We Need an Athiest on the Supreme Court???

    Makes sense to me.
     
  4. khayos

    khayos In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,675
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Re: We Need an Athiest on the Supreme Court???

    Nice cherry picking by the LA times... some more context shows Jefferson was clearly against the excesses of organized religion but not against belief in Jesus & God.

    "The truth is that the greatest enemies to the doctrines of Jesus are those calling themselves the expositors of them, who have perverted them for the structure of a system of fancy absolutely incomprehensible, and without any foundation in his genuine words. And the day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the supreme being as his father in the womb of a virgin will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter. But we may hope that the dawn of reason and freedom of thought in these United States will do away with all this artificial scaffolding, and restore to us the primitive and genuine doctrines of this the most venerated reformer of human errors.

    So much for your quotation of Calvin's `mon dieu! jusqu'a quand' in which, when addressed to the God of Jesus, and our God, I join you cordially, and await his time and will with more readiness than reluctance. May we meet there again, in Congress, with our antient Colleagues, and recieve with them the seal of approbation `Well done, good and faithful servants.' "
     
    Last edited: May 4, 2010
  5. chicowalker

    chicowalker Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    13,236
    Likes Received:
    139
    Ratings:
    +296 / 3 / -4

    Re: We Need an Athiest on the Supreme Court???

    Regardless of Jefferson's (or anybdy else's) views, if an atheist is among the top candidates for the bench, I'd like to see it as a nice balance (and, I admit, to spite the religionists who have a problem with atheists / agnostics -- and there are plenty of them out there)
     
  6. khayos

    khayos In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,675
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Re: We Need an Athiest on the Supreme Court???

    Except the whole rule of law is based in religion and someone who would make it known that they fly in the face of that concept is, in comparison, a radical. It might be okay to shake things up once in awhile but to do so as someone who's job it is to look at precedent? Scary.
     
  7. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    39,681
    Likes Received:
    558
    Ratings:
    +1,350 / 34 / -28

    #87 Jersey


    Well ... as our everyday news relays to us ... when there are too many of similar beliefs in power things aren't for the best for everybody. I personally have less problems with an atheist than I do an overly religious person of any denomination.
     
  8. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,166
    Likes Received:
    121
    Ratings:
    +303 / 9 / -12

    I was thinking of a thread for this column but this seems like a good place for this link:


    American Thinker: Declaration of Independence as Law



    The notion that we have natural right from our creator that government cannot take away in fundamental to the founding of this country.

    Absent A Creator (ie God) our rights derive from the state, very dangerous for freedom and the path to tyranny.

    What does an Atheist see as the source for our rights?
     
  9. sdaniels7114

    sdaniels7114 Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    5,742
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0

    Re: We Need an Athiest on the Supreme Court???

    You have it twisted around. God was invented by man to make him(man) feel better about himself and his existence in the world. Law was invented for more sensible reasons.
     
  10. chicowalker

    chicowalker Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    13,236
    Likes Received:
    139
    Ratings:
    +296 / 3 / -4

    Re: We Need an Athiest on the Supreme Court???

    The rule of law is based in religion? I think you're living in different times, my friend.

    What exactly do you find "scary" about an atheist possibly being on the Court? What are some scenarios you can envision unfolding?

    This truly fascinates me. (Seriously -- not being sarcastic.)
     
  11. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    42,286
    Likes Received:
    225
    Ratings:
    +517 / 14 / -28

    Guess the only fear is the fear of the unknown, no problem from this sector, the Supreme Court should be made up of the most qualified jurist, without regard for their religious or lack thereof beliefs...

    I always smile at Jefferson Quotes, as he is at best ambivalent...

    Jesuit Watch: THOMAS JEFFERSON - TEN QUOTES

     
  12. khayos

    khayos In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,675
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Re: We Need an Athiest on the Supreme Court???

    Most law starts with the ten commandments.

    What I find scary is that someone who has an openly contradictory viewpoint is vying for the job e.g. I wouldn't expect a pacifist to join the Marines or a fur farmer to join PETA.
     
  13. khayos

    khayos In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,675
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Re: We Need an Athiest on the Supreme Court???

    Okay, I'll avoid your non-belief and put it this way -- if both systems were invented by man, can't you see that they have been intertwined since the beginning? Religion was the sole form of law and its roots are the same.
     
  14. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    42,286
    Likes Received:
    225
    Ratings:
    +517 / 14 / -28

    Re: We Need an Athiest on the Supreme Court???

    Do we really know the religion of anyone?? Any one of the Supreme Court Justices could be an atheist, agnostic or muslim, as religion is a personal thing between man and god/nature or whatever..
     
  15. Mrs.PatsFanInVa

    Mrs.PatsFanInVa PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    16,056
    Likes Received:
    346
    Ratings:
    +618 / 12 / -5

    #24 Jersey

    Re: We Need an Athiest on the Supreme Court???

    What's more - does it really matter? Very few people actually practice whatever religion they claim as their own, anyhow.
     
  16. wistahpatsfan

    wistahpatsfan Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    15,675
    Likes Received:
    11
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -1

    #75 Jersey

    Re: We Need an Athiest on the Supreme Court???

    Religion was law. Law was religion. It was like that until the evolution of the new way of thinking known today as science. Science is new to human culture. Until it was discovered along with something called "Reason", law and religion were indistinguishable. It was a convenient way for despots and kings to dominate the illiterate and starving serfs. Reason and science brought about democracy, technology, understanding of nature (including how the human brain works) and the recognition that the Old Man in the Sky didn't control the floods and the sun's rotation around the Earth.

    It will take a while for the religious to join the non-religious because 20,000 years of superstition, mythology and ignorance if science will be a tough knot to untie. It will happen, though. The sooner the better.
     
  17. khayos

    khayos In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,675
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Re: We Need an Athiest on the Supreme Court???

    Good point. Which is to say, I'd rather they keep their beliefs quiet than espouse than they are contradictory.
     
  18. khayos

    khayos In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,675
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Re: We Need an Athiest on the Supreme Court???

    And science without religion, oops sorry -- morality, will always lose its way.
     
  19. khayos

    khayos In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,675
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Oh and since when was the Left the great champion of Jefferson? You know he owned slaves right?
     
  20. wistahpatsfan

    wistahpatsfan Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    15,675
    Likes Received:
    11
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -1

    #75 Jersey

    Re: We Need an Athiest on the Supreme Court???

    Prove it...:D
     

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>