- Joined
- May 1, 2008
- Messages
- 16,682
- Reaction score
- 3,686
OK, let's be real. Nap Harris is available. We badly need an ILB. We haven't signed him. Perhaps Belichick has a reason for not signing him.
Absolutely. I'm not sure why we haven't looked at him, so maybe there's something that BB doesn't like. He still seems by far the best readily available candidate out there.
And also, let's get real about Dansby. He is under contract and is very unlikely to be going anywhere.
Hence the use of the term "miracle". All speculation involving Dansby is pure fantasy and lust at this point. BB has the ammunition to make a move IF Arizona would be willing to listen, but it is a long shot.
I do certainly agree that I would like to see either of them added. I would rather add Taylor, which would likely mean that Thomas moves inside.
I don't think that Belichick see any problems at OLB at all; otherwise he might have found help somewhere in the draft. Belichick's solution was re-sign Woods, sign Banta-Cain and bring back Redd (he didn't bring back Robertson or Ruud).
And obviously I have no clue with regard to Belichick's analysis of the ILB position. I would have drafted Laurinitis at 34 and Will Moore at 40 or wherever. Belichick must be expecting Guyton and Bruschi to be major contributers this year. If Guyton is viewed as a starter, then obviously the situation isn't very dire. I too would feel alot better if we signed a starter quality linebacker.
Clearly BB had the option of drafting Laurinaitis or Maualuga at 23/26/34 and taking a safety at 40/41/47 and passed, so he sees more value from Chung, and doesn't care about what that does to Riddler's blood pressure. It's quite possible that BB will stand "Pat". But he did draft McKenzie, so it's not unreasonable to assume that he will bring someone in for depth with McKenzie's loss.