Welcome to PatsFans.com

U.S., others agree to nuclear talks with Iran

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by Holy Diver, Mar 6, 2012.

  1. Holy Diver

    Holy Diver Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    10,834
    Likes Received:
    15
    Ratings:
    +23 / 0 / -0

    #80 Jersey

    The United States, France, Britain, China, Russia and Germany said they would resume stalled talks in a letter from the European Union's foreign policy chief, Catherine Ashton.

    U.S., others agree to nuclear talks with Iran - CNN.com

    Begs a few questions (as always)

    1. Why don't the P5+1 nations agree to BUILD IRAN A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT or three? That way we can conratct the work, and make sure its only for power. Seems sensible.

    2. Why the flunk does a nation sitting on the earths 2nd largets oil reserves need nuclear power? seems they could just drill baby drill?

    3. I thought we didn't negotiate with terrorists? Unless we are selling arms, and centrifuges...
  2. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    24,762
    Likes Received:
    74
    Ratings:
    +162 / 7 / -13



    Because we don't want them to have material to build bombs they say they are not building.


    They don't need nuke plants. They want to build bombs.



    Obama will go there and bow to the mullahs any day now. He is friends with terrorist (Ayers/Dohrn) why not negotiate with them... :D
  3. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    41,441
    Likes Received:
    139
    Ratings:
    +278 / 10 / -26

    Glad to see they are giving peace a chance, instead of hopping on that train for a possible doomsday scenario..
  4. Holy Diver

    Holy Diver Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    10,834
    Likes Received:
    15
    Ratings:
    +23 / 0 / -0

    #80 Jersey

    you are missing the logic....


    WE build the nuke plants and control the materials. The fuel for a nuke plant can't be used to build an atomic bomb.

    If they want power so much....why don't they just use the oil they already have? refining it is cheaper than nuclear power.

    If they are associated with Hezbollah (sp?)....why are we negotiating with them?




    My point is....

    Its all fishy ...from every logical angle, ours...theirs...everyones



    this is all pointing to a horrible end


    EDIT: seems the russians already have built them a power plant...


    http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/03/06/iran-nuclear-idINDEE8250AY20120306

    "Russia, which built Iran's first nuclear power plant and has far warmer relations with Tehran than Western nations do, has often stressed the need for talks and said coercive pressure on Tehran is counterproductive."

    Since they already have nuclear power, and would be able to create a "dirty bomb" from the waste. These talks are pointless.

    why are they talking again?
    Last edited: Mar 6, 2012

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>