What's interesting is the nit picky nature of the pieces offered up.
It seems like every writer has a pet complaint: Safety, OL, WR, etc. I guess they just don't feel they are doing their job unless they gripe about something, or maybe Boston/New England fans are just so addicted to the sourness that I saw for the first time in the early 70's against Yaz, that they just do not know how to be comfortable with a range of feelings on one topic. I.E. what is the importance of the overall picture/status vs. some sub section concerns.
Like a hierarchical mind would say: "we have a really strong team, with a few questionable areas. It will be interesting to see how it all plays out, and what BB will do to fix them, and any injuries that crop up."
as opposed to:
"I can't believe what a MORON BB is, two tight ends!, Maneri gone! some old goat brought in to play RG, Solder SUCKS!!. Why did he cut Sanders AND Meri - Jeezuz Christ!!" As soon as some Jet or Indy fan shows up and says we won't win, the same person will say, "We are going to win the SB, because we have the best team, go away troll!"
The writers fuel the fans, the fans fuel the writers. To both: get a funking grip.