- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,883
- Reaction score
- 66,866
Can't say I agree. The article regurgitated some recent history, didn't really manage to make it relevant to anything we saw this past Sunday or what it means going forward. I don't know what the point of it was other than a scatershot of loosely tied negative observations. It a rather poor football article and I am kind of surprised you thought it at all interesting or informative, if indeed you did?
Reality, as noted by Mazz, and/or several others with much better analysis abilities:
The Patriots have struggled to a 2-2 start without really playing a full game
The Bills, and Fitzpicksix in particular, were handing out gifts in that game
Secondary still stinks
Front line not getting pressure
Thomas performance being overplayed
Welker's role due, in no small part, to the injuries to Hernandez and Edelman
The Patriots were on the brink of real trouble when Wilfork came up huge with that fumble recovery. Let's not all start demanding the lockstep start again.