- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 30,681
- Reaction score
- 23,359
Who wins: The Herald, everyone keeps talking about them, and keeps going to their site.
Nice short-term perspective.
Let's see how they do on this in the larger (more important) battle.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Who wins: The Herald, everyone keeps talking about them, and keeps going to their site.
Too little. Too late. Yawn.
I accept his apology. However, that doesn't mean he and his editors still don't need to feel the reprucusions of their gross negligence. Fines, suspensions, terminations, something. There needs to be some punishment dolled out by the Herald to prove they are serious about the integrity of their newspaper.
This is like me cheating on wife, saying sorry, then asking what's for dinner.
Doesn't work that way John.
Tomase didn't get the SB video story right the first time and he didn't get the explanation and apology right the first time. He had to be told to appologize to the parties, because he didn't do it the first runaround. The herald is in disarray and turmoil from the editors to the writers, the house of cards are about to fall. They still don't get it, but they will, the hard way.He and Herald Management had more than TWO DAYS to write the explanation piece and they needed to be further shamed into writing an apology addendum by the resultant firestorm of the public?
Shouldn't that have been the FIRST thing written in his "explanation" piece?????
My God, it's true - - - the Herald IS where all the high school dropouts get jobs from their politically connected Uncles.
I know there are alot of people saying they will never read the Herald because of this story, but I can't imagine spending one moment of my day caring to read ANYTHING by people who need diagrams to tie their own shoe laces.
Maybe donate $10Mill to the charity of Krafts choice?
"Reader reaction has been strong to today’s explanation of where we went wrong with our Rams walkthrough"...J Tomasse
It sounds to me that they tried to run the first so called apology which really was an (excuse not an apology) and the public wasn't buying it. So JT had to come back with a second. The Herald doesn't seem to want to (OWN) its mistake. They keep trying to play it as not being the big deal that (we the fans) are making it out to be.
Nice short-term perspective.
Let's see how they do on this in the larger (more important) battle.
Well, in the grand scheme of press f*ck ups......
Is this one worse than the initial press reports regarding Jessica Lynch's rescue. That one missed the mark big time.
Fox's beating the war drums regarding our invasion of Iraq.
Fox's current beating of the war drums regarding why we should invade Iran.
As press screw ups go, this one is minor. And it effected a sport, not national security.
I have NO idea what the Herald is trying to accomplish by all the trashing of the fans and the team. There's no logic in antagonizing the Pats or the fans any further.What's it going to get them? They may catch a lawsuit,and diminish they're circulation by keeping this up.Let's not forget that they think we are nothing but middle aged men with jersies. I take exception to that comment by the way.
I'm certainly no fan of the Herald, but I'm impressed any time someone owns up to their mistakes and the publication prints it. Far too few media outlets ever admit they were wrong, and the Herald's front page apology yesterday was truly impressive. I think they will do a much better job vetting stories, especially negative stories, in the future.