- Joined
- Sep 14, 2004
- Messages
- 2,956
- Reaction score
- 126
Trying to pass the time a little bit so ..
I read something about the Hawks running game doing really well in the second half vs the first half of
games. Why, because they say the opposing Dline guys get tired and that's when Lynch gets going.
So it seems a way to counter that would be to somehow keep our Dline guys from getting too tired. Right?
The more time they have to rest between defensive stands the better they will be it the second half.
So if the offense takes as much time as possible between downs that would give the Defense more time to rest.
One set of downs= about 3-5mins (4 x 40 + commercial time?)
and say each additional set of downs adds about 2 mins ave. ( set may end on 1st 2nd or 3rd down)
But then again if the no huddle is working and is better at sustaining drives that might give the D more time to rest?
Of course the D can help it's self by getting lots of 3 and outs.
Maybe it doesn't matter??
Does the no Huddle even give the PATs an advantage with the Seahawks?
I think it might because their interior Dline doesn't have much depth from what I read.
So the no huddle, if it can sustain drives, would wear down their only good interior Dline guys.
Any thoughts here besides I should find something else to pass the time ?
I read something about the Hawks running game doing really well in the second half vs the first half of
games. Why, because they say the opposing Dline guys get tired and that's when Lynch gets going.
So it seems a way to counter that would be to somehow keep our Dline guys from getting too tired. Right?
The more time they have to rest between defensive stands the better they will be it the second half.
So if the offense takes as much time as possible between downs that would give the Defense more time to rest.
One set of downs= about 3-5mins (4 x 40 + commercial time?)
and say each additional set of downs adds about 2 mins ave. ( set may end on 1st 2nd or 3rd down)
But then again if the no huddle is working and is better at sustaining drives that might give the D more time to rest?
Of course the D can help it's self by getting lots of 3 and outs.
Maybe it doesn't matter??
Does the no Huddle even give the PATs an advantage with the Seahawks?
I think it might because their interior Dline doesn't have much depth from what I read.
So the no huddle, if it can sustain drives, would wear down their only good interior Dline guys.
Any thoughts here besides I should find something else to pass the time ?