Welcome to PatsFans.com

Tiebreaker which gave Miami the division

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by ALP, Jan 14, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ALP

    ALP Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2007
    Messages:
    7,403
    Likes Received:
    9
    Ratings:
    +12 / 0 / -0

    sry to bring up old memories and old discussions, but was talking about this w/ someone, and i forgot which tiebraker was used to give miami the division, and why it was a stupid tiebraker to use

    thanks
  2. fnordcircle

    fnordcircle ( o Y o ) PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    3,500
    Likes Received:
    63
    Ratings:
    +177 / 5 / -12

    Re: tiebraker which gave miami the division

    Conference record.

    They had identical common opponents records cause MIA lost to Arizona but beat San Diego.
  3. jmt57

    jmt57 Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2005
    Messages:
    13,085
    Likes Received:
    70
    Ratings:
    +168 / 0 / -0

    Re: tiebraker which gave miami the division

    It came down to the 4th tiebreaker, which is record within the conference. If you look at who the teams beat and lost to, the difference was the Dolphins defeating San Diego, who beat the Pats.

    NFL Tie-Breaking Procedures

    1.) Head-to Head -- Tied 1-1
    2.) W-L in Division -- Pats 4-2, Dolphins 4-2
    3.) W-L in Common Games -- all games were common except for the Pats two versus #1 teams (Colts, Steelers) and the Dolphins versus #4 teams (Texans, Ravens.) Forget the debate whether playing each other is a 'common game' or not; it's irrelevant since it would end the tiebreaker back at rule #1, and if not, being 1-1 or 0-0 makes no difference.

    The Dolphins lost to both Baltimore and Houston, and the Pats lost to both Indy and Pittsburgh; their record against common opponents was an identical 11-3 (or 10-2, depending on your point of view.)

    4.) W-L in Conference Games -- Against the AFC West, Miami lost to Arizona in week 2, then beat Seattle by 2 in week 10, St Louis by 4 in week 13, and SF by 5 in week 15. That leaves a 8-4 record against AFC teams. The Pats swept the NFC West, leaving them with a 7-5 within the conference -- and Miami wins the tiebreaker.

    In the name of unbiased reporting and for those that look at the glass as half-empty, Miami beat San Diego - at home - and the Pats did not beat them - on the road - and that was the difference in the record against AFC teams between the Pats and the Dolphins.


    EDIT: as fnordcircle mentioned, had the Pats and Dolphins results against the Chargers and Cardinals - a net 1-1 won-loss record - been reversed (i.e., Pats beat San Diego but lose to Arizona, and Miami loses to San Diego but beats Arizona), then the division title and playoff berth are reversed.
    Last edited: Jan 14, 2009
  4. bizarroAndres

    bizarroAndres Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Re: tiebraker which gave miami the division

    also, if they pats won more games or the dolphins won less games, we would have won the division. but that didnt happen
  5. fnordcircle

    fnordcircle ( o Y o ) PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    3,500
    Likes Received:
    63
    Ratings:
    +177 / 5 / -12

    Re: tiebraker which gave miami the division

    It is also worth noting that the sun will come up tomorrow.
  6. cavtroop

    cavtroop Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,911
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Re: tiebraker which gave miami the division

    I heard the sky is blue, also.
  7. godef

    godef Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    3,118
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    Re: tiebraker which gave miami the division

    I don't see how playing each other can be considered common opponents. The Pats played the DOLPHINS, whereas the Dolphins played the PATS. These are NOT common opponents. Now, if the Patrs played themselves, that would be another story.
  8. godef

    godef Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    3,118
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    Re: tiebraker which gave miami the division

    Increasing darkness towards the evening.
  9. Patsfanin Philly

    Patsfanin Philly Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    6,708
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +29 / 0 / -0

    #95 Jersey

    Re: tiebraker which gave miami the division

    In the east too........
  10. Sicilian

    Sicilian On the Roster

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    4,885
    Likes Received:
    103
    Ratings:
    +228 / 1 / -2

    Re: tiebraker which gave miami the division

    Eh, doesn't really matter. If you've reached that tiebreaker, you automatically have a split of the games between you. If you didn't, the tie-breakers would have stopped at the first one (head-to-head).
  11. Gwedd

    Gwedd PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Messages:
    4,965
    Likes Received:
    61
    Ratings:
    +109 / 0 / -1

    #61 Jersey

    And Pennington still has a noodle arm. :rolleyes:
  12. upstater1

    upstater1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    13,027
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +43 / 4 / -3

    Conference tie-breaker makes no sense for teams in the same division.

    Miami lost to Arizona, New England lost to San Diego. Miami lost AT Arizona, New England lost AT San Diego. The scores were almost identical, the games were in the first part of the season. Why would one loss count more than the other? Makes no sense.

    They need to move another tie-breaker up to #4, maybe strength of victory or something like that.
  13. TheGodInAGreyHoodie

    TheGodInAGreyHoodie Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    Messages:
    6,631
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +25 / 0 / -0

    I would agree SoV is a better tiebreaker than Conf record for the division. BTW Miami would have won that one too.
  14. Sicilian

    Sicilian On the Roster

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    4,885
    Likes Received:
    103
    Ratings:
    +228 / 1 / -2

    Exactly. If you're leaving it down to the 4th tie-breaker or lower, it's all basically a coin flip at that point anyway. Don't like the 4th tie-breaker? Beat the Dolphins twice and make it moot.
  15. Patsrock

    Patsrock Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,361
    Likes Received:
    27
    Ratings:
    +46 / 0 / -0

    Don't give up 3 and 15. Don't drop an easy td reception. It is that simple.
  16. ALP

    ALP Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2007
    Messages:
    7,403
    Likes Received:
    9
    Ratings:
    +12 / 0 / -0

    i see what ur saying...
  17. upstater1

    upstater1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    13,027
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +43 / 4 / -3

    Yadda Yadda Yadda

    Please stop the nonsense.

    We're talking about something else.

    Take the freakin' Patriots out of it.
  18. spacecrime

    spacecrime Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    17
    Ratings:
    +17 / 0 / -0

    Re: tiebraker which gave miami the division

    heh heh. it was kind of overstating the obvious, wasn't it?
  19. spacecrime

    spacecrime Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    17
    Ratings:
    +17 / 0 / -0

    Bull. The only reason you are talking about the tiebreaker is because the Pats didn't make the playoffs. We've had the same tiebreaker order for years and no one complained. And now you are trying to say it isn't just about the Pats.

    It is simply whining and crying. The rules are fair, they apply to everone equally, and everyone knew the tiebreakers beforehand.

    It is childish to complain now.
  20. upstater1

    upstater1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    13,027
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +43 / 4 / -3

    God, your response is bull.

    No one complained because no one knows all the rules. I never even looked at the tiebreakers this closely. I'm sure I could find other things to complain about if I was actively going out of my way to do it.

    The point is, you can't justify conference record being there. The point is, something else makes infinitely more sense, like strength of victory. And guess what, the Patriots still don't make it in with that as the tiebreaker.

    Jeez, why are people so reactionary around here?
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>