Welcome to PatsFans.com

Three Super Bowl wins vs two Super Bowl loses

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by festy1986, Sep 19, 2013.

?

What would you rather have?

  1. Three superbowl wins

    29 vote(s)
    93.5%
  2. Two Super Bowl loses, including the perfect season.

    2 vote(s)
    6.5%
  1. festy1986

    festy1986 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2006
    Messages:
    652
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    So I was thinking from a previous post I made in another thread about this. Maybe this question has been posed before but I didn't see it. Now I admit its a dumb question but it may have its merits for some.

    Would you rather of won the two super bowls we lost, and most recent appearance, one of which included a perfect season or would you rather be the winners of the three we did win. It's one more Super Bowl win but all of them are approaching 10 years old.

    As much as I hate that we lost the perfect season, I feel having one more Super Bowl and Brady with 3 being too good to trade

    Of course the easy answer is I'd rather we have 5. 7 if you include the two times we lost the afc champ
  2. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    37,707
    Likes Received:
    258
    Ratings:
    +477 / 2 / -10

    #87 Jersey

    Hopefully not trending off topic but I would have loved to have a healthy Welker and a healthy Gronk and Belichick and Brady wearing 5 rings.
  3. fnordcircle

    fnordcircle ( o Y o ) PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    3,502
    Likes Received:
    63
    Ratings:
    +177 / 5 / -12

    This poll is basically -

    Which would you rather:

    [_] Bang the 3 hottest chicks in the world
    [_] Sit in the room while someone else bangs the 2 hottest chicks in the world.
  4. PatsFanJess

    PatsFanJess Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    Messages:
    1,496
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    More SB wins= better
  5. oldrover

    oldrover Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,070
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Which would I rather have: something, or almost something? Gee...
  6. Wax Frog

    Wax Frog Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2007
    Messages:
    2,576
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

  7. TommyBrady12

    TommyBrady12 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Messages:
    3,637
    Likes Received:
    61
    Ratings:
    +142 / 9 / -8

    #12 Jersey

    Not sure i get this poll :confused:

    Edit: never mind, but the poll is written confusing
  8. festy1986

    festy1986 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2006
    Messages:
    652
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Yea my bad, written on my iPhone and obviously did not proof read.

    What I MEANT to ask was you you trade the three wins into loses if you could have the two loses be wins.

    Like I said, it's really a silly question. I know I'd rather not of lost the first 3 and win the last two personally but some of the fans certainly had a high emphasis on perfect season and such.
  9. JoeSixPat

    JoeSixPat Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    9,852
    Likes Received:
    27
    Ratings:
    +46 / 2 / -0

    :wha:


    :confused:


    :idontgetit:


    :confused2:


    :crazy:


    :popcorn:
  10. Armchair Quarterback

    Armchair Quarterback Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    2,610
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +75 / 1 / -2

    #37 Jersey

    Wins are better than losses, so I have to vote for the wins.


    If you meant to say have the two losses be wins which would include an unbeaten season, I'd still say 3.

    Actually F that, I want all 5 - no all 7 be wins.
  11. LuRkeR1978

    LuRkeR1978 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2005
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    #85 Jersey

    I believe that without the first 3 SB wins, the next 2 appearances don't happen.

    BB's reputation was shaky coming in, in 2000. The only reason his coaching style survived in NE is because of 2001. If the tuck rule doesn't exist, there is no dynasty. The 2002 team wasn't as good as 01, and maybe Rodney doesn't sign in 2003. Branch doesn't become SB39 MVP and leaves, to open the door for WWW, and Moss.

    So many things had fell into place for that insane run from 01-04, we may just never see something like it again, with any team.
  12. JoeSixPat

    JoeSixPat Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    9,852
    Likes Received:
    27
    Ratings:
    +46 / 2 / -0

    OK - now I get it - sorry 'bout the smilies above.

    The answer is still no 3 is still better than 2
  13. upstater1

    upstater1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    13,027
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +43 / 4 / -3

    First of all, half the fans on this board would be dead from suicide.

    We lived through 1976, 1978, 1986, 1996, and you want to throw 3 Super Bowl losses in 2001, 2003, 2004, a Brady pick against Denver in the 2005 playoffs, a meltdown and ref bag job against the Colts in the 2006 AFC CG into the mix?

    If that's what you're asking, 9 years when you have a chance to win it all and you crap the bed, we'd all be dead.

    But that 10th year of 19-0 would have made the Red Sox 8 or 9 decade drought look like nothing. There would have been a huge explosion. I think Boston would have been destroyed if the Patriots had lost 5 Super Bowls and then gone 19-0.
  14. Froob

    Froob Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    4,906
    Likes Received:
    26
    Ratings:
    +62 / 0 / -3

    #32 Jersey

    I want 53 championships.
  15. Brady6

    Brady6 On the Roster

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2013
    Messages:
    9,196
    Likes Received:
    304
    Ratings:
    +635 / 75 / -118

    #12 Jersey

    Re: Re: Three Super Bowl wins vs two Super Bowl loses

    So basically I think the real question you're attempting to ask is would we rather have 2 SB wins and a perfect season or 3 SB wins and no perfect season. Is that the correct way to view it?
  16. the Patriot

    the Patriot Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2007
    Messages:
    447
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    3 Super Bowls. Duh! :rolleyes:
  17. ausbacker

    ausbacker Brady > Manning. PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,183
    Likes Received:
    110
    Ratings:
    +257 / 3 / -2

    #51 Jersey

    In my opinion, 3 Super Bowls is better than 2 Super Bowls including a perfect season. That said, the Patriots beat themselves in those 2 losses so it's a moot point.
  18. doesntmatter1

    doesntmatter1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2009
    Messages:
    979
    Likes Received:
    15
    Ratings:
    +25 / 0 / -0

    I've got a better solution. Use my fancy time machine and go back in time to kick archie manning in the balls. No Peyton and Eli=3 more rings.
  19. patsfan-1982

    patsfan-1982 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2007
    Messages:
    4,045
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +7 / 1 / -0

    if they don't win the 3 SB's in Brady's first 5 years in the NFL dose he become the house hold name and super star he is today ? and if brady has 0 ring until 2007 dose BB go out and get Brady Moss and welker for him if he has not shown he can win the big one is BB still the HC if there are now SB wins.


    bottom line is if brady dose not win in 2001 Bledsoe dose not get traded and BB ends up with Cleveland 2.0 and dose not even make it to coach the pats in 2007 so ill take the 3 SB's
  20. PATRlOT

    PATRlOT Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2013
    Messages:
    1,100
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I'd rather lose in 2004 in exchange for a win in 2007 (undefeated)

    Still 3 wins.

    I know that's not what you're asking but still...

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>